Originally posted by zzeitg Once I almost ordered this lens from a seller on eBay. Finally I didn't as I thought that I already had too many 50mm lenses. Your photos make me regret that I did not buy it (and who knows if there ever will be 2nd chance).
Here's a funny story, or would be funny if it hadn't cost me $ to learn my lesson.
I had all the Voigtlanders except the 125 (a lovely lens I've heard, but not really a FL I have much use for). I eventually decided I didn't care much for my VL 20mm or 40mm lenses. They were okay IQ-wise, but I have a very hard time manual focusing pancake lenses. I sold them.
I've been trying to finish a book, keeping my head buried in work and doing little else. At some point I looked at my lonely camera bag that had just been sitting there for over a year and thought "I'm not using any of it, why not sell all my VLs, and just get a couple of good zooms," which I consequently did and bought the DA 16-85 and DA 60-250. Very nice zoom lenses.
It wasn't long before I started being nagged by a feeling of incompleteness. I missed the IQ of a great prime, and began trying out a few. Looking for something I preferred over Voigtlanders I went through all the ZK Zeiss lenses (except the 20mm and 100 Makro), a few top shelf Sigmas, various Pentax primes—(sold them all except the Pentax FA 31 and Sigma 70mm macro, superb lenses, plus I kept the 16-85 zoom).
After all that, I realized there is no lens available for Pentax that I prefer to the higher FL Voigtlanders, so as of today I've required three of my favorite—the 58mm, 90mm, and 180mm (I wish I hadn't sold the VL 75mm, but I doubt I'll ever find that beauty).
Anyway, I now feel complete again