Originally posted by Jonathan Mac Your images show what I found when comparing the two lenses - the K produces a 3D, realistic quality in some photos that the M does not, I think it's due to contrast or micro-contrast. In sharpness and colour I found them to be virtually identical.
You are right, but the difference is very narrow. Both are great.
---------- Post added 03-28-17 at 07:15 PM ----------
Originally posted by paulh Thanks for doing this comparison. I agree with Jonathan's assessment - there is a subtle but noticeable difference there. As a happy M28/3.5 user, I'd probably have a hard time justifying the price premium of the K28 - unless a bargain came along (not likely!).
I will add more pictures to the album.
The bargain appeared, that's why I have both.
The bid for the M reached only 35 euros, and the K was a buy-it-now 74,50 euros incl. shipping bargain that appeared in France.
Both are like new.