Originally posted by abacus07 What I like about the M's is the low cost and small size.
If you will look for them these days, you might find that they are not so cheap anymore.
I find that I can get equivalent M42 lenses for their price or under and I can use those in Av mode. The M lenses that I tried, including the M40, were all suffering from purple fringing/blooming in certain lighting situations. The small size is great but also leads to tradeoffs - the 135 had the longest minimum focusing distance of all 135mm lenses I tried - not very convenient. And of course, once you go for other focal lengths than the classic triplet of 28/50/135, prices climb quickly.
Originally posted by repaap These are actually on of first puctures I have seen taken with M 40. It seems to be quite under rated for what it is capable. Maybe one uses it makes here something
It's a great lens. I think it's underrated because its price climbed faster than other lenses because of the pancake novelty and also because the 40mm FL is not that appealing and f/2.8 is not that fast. So people would rather go for a much less expensive 50/1.7 than for such a choice. But otherwise it is a very nice lens, it is sharp wide open, and I like its rendering wide open too - it almost makes me wonder if I missed something on the other K/M lenses I had (M28, M135, K200).
Here are a couple more samples. The first one is my favorite shot from this lens - it's taken the first day I used it.
@f/2.8:
@f/8:
Originally posted by jsherman999 Very nice!
Thanks!