Originally posted by iheiramo I'm not so much into side by side comparisons. Real life tests are more into my taste. Both f1.4 and f1.7 are fine lenses. Either do fine and one does not really need both. Now that I have them I choose f1.4 for wide open shooting and f1.7 for general use stopped down. This is a bit of heresy, but if I do get K/A 50/1.2 at somepoint both will mostly sit on my shelf.
I'm supposed to write reviews of these too, but it feels such dull pasttime that I've managed to postpone it 4 months already. There's a high risk I forgot to do it altogether.
I'm sorry, I was referring to a real-life use/comparison of the two lenses, not a review in the strict sense I guess. I remember you did something like that sometime ago.
---------- Post added 12-17-20 at 01:07 AM ----------
Originally posted by Canada_Rockies I would much rather use a lens than review it.
I agree, but you could use it and review it. In general, I prefer these types of hands-on-in-the-field-reviews to the lab testing with a resolution chart.