[TroutHunterJohn]

The 24-70 seems far more flare resistant than my 16-50.

[TroutHunterJohn]

Heavy equipment on a damp day in the Pacific Northwest. No, this was not HDR. The light was just brilliant with the stormy sky and wet vegetation.

My 16 - 50 is my most used lens, and it still makes me do a double take when processing images from it. Very sharp and fantastic colors. When I step up to FF and the 24-70, I hope I'm similarly impressed.

Ooops, just realized this should be in the da* forum. Please forgive

[tomO2013]

Two more from a very wet city. Thankfully 24-70 is weather sealed


waterdrop by tom.ohle, on Flickr


Splash! by tom.ohle, on Flickr

[Rondec]

A couple more with the 24-70.

[Rondec]

Smoky Mountains.

[Rondec]

Woodland Path.

[Rondec]

Random photos with the DFA 24-70.

[Rondec]

A couple of DFA 24-70 shots.

[EricBrown]

First URBEX trip, great for low light and dust!!

[biz-engineer]

Random photos with the DFA 24-70.

Your landscape photos are awesome, just wondering if you use a special tuning of colors.

[Rondec]

Your landscape photos are awesome, just wondering if you use a special tuning of colors.

Thank you. I'm trying for a natural, not over saturated look. Hopefully I get there.

I am using Lightroom 5 and Huelight color profiles and then I run most images through Nik Color Efex where I created a preset that adds some contrast, warms images a little, and does a little detail enhancement. That's usually about it.

The pixel shift images come from DCU with natural preset, a little sharpening and usually some shadow enhancement.

I hope that helps.

[Rondec]

A couple of pixel shifted shots using the DFA 24-70

[Rondec]

Tree at Sunrise.



For what it is worth, the full size image on Flickr is better than this down sized version.

[Rondec]

A couple of shots with DFA 24-70 (both pixel shifted -- full res on Flickr).

Barn and Cornfield.



Truck at Dawn.

[Rondec]

A couple of shots with the DFA 24-70.





Both are pixel shifted.