 |
 | 14361 Likes | Search this Thread |
| 10-28-2010, 11:03 PM | #5686 |
|
Super Takumar 35mm f/2   | |
| 10-28-2010, 11:24 PM | #5687 |
 Pentax K20D S-M-C Takumar 35/2 | |
| 10-29-2010, 03:19 AM | #5688 |
| Morning trio    k-x Super Takumar 85/1.9 @ f8 Minimal LR PP. Last edited by Porga; 10-29-2010 at 04:00 AM. | |
| 10-29-2010, 04:39 AM | #5689 |
|
My second roll of film shot with my Spotmatic and various Takumars:    | |
| 10-29-2010, 05:02 AM | #5690 |
 Pentax K20D Super Takumar 85/1.9 | |
| 10-29-2010, 06:30 AM | #5691 |
 Originally posted by Ira  That was a touching story, but you know as well as I do that not all Taks are equal. And to me, the Super-Tak 105 is the least equal of all. Mind you, like I said, I'm going to dedicate this lens to macro work with my bellows, and extension tubes just purchased. (Original Pentax brand!) But for walking around shooting in my bright Florida sun--eech. It's either flare, or washed out. I saw a lot of mick's pics and didn't watch any problem with the 105s. It's a nice lens to me. Really not as sharp as the 85 (specially the SMC 1,8 version, the best for me). A few days ago, I saw a comparison among the SMC tak 105 and the nikkor one. The differences were subtles and not for the nikkor in all the cases. At F/ 2,8, the nikkor won. But not at 5,6. The 105 not so bad, man.  Yes, I know, the tests are relative things, but they give us an idea of the lens rendering. My best regards, Rino. | |
| 10-29-2010, 06:35 AM - 1 Like | #5692 |
| Originally posted by estudleon Hi Ira. I saw a lot of mick's pics and didn't watch any problem with the 105s. It's a nice lens to me. Really not as sharp as the 85 (specially the SMC 1,8 version, the best for me). A few days ago, I saw a comparison among the SMC tak 105 and the nikkor one. The differences were subtles and not for the nikkor in all the cases. At F/ 2,8, the nikkor won. But not at 5,6. The 105 not so bad, man. Yes, I know, the tests are relative things, but they give us an idea of the lens rendering. My best regards, Rino. But they weren't mine!  Me and this lens just don't get along, but maybe we'll reconcile when I start using it for macro. | |
| 10-29-2010, 09:28 AM | #5693 |
|
Takumar 58/2, 5D, 1600 isos : # 1  # 2  # 3  # 4  | |
| 10-29-2010, 10:49 AM | #5694 |
| Quote: CarbonR: Takumar 58/2, 5D, 1600 isos | |
| 10-29-2010, 04:58 PM | #5696 |
|
Ladies and Gentlemen, allow me to introduce Miss Rene Wing:  Pentax K20D S-M-C Takumar 105/2.8 | |
| 10-29-2010, 06:04 PM | #5697 |
| Originally posted by mglowe Mike Cash gets consistently superb looking, artistic results from his 105s.  Pentax K20D Takumar 105/2.8 (Preset) | |
| 10-29-2010, 06:56 PM | #5698 |
| Originally posted by Mike Cash Ladies and Gentlemen, allow me to introduce Miss Rene Wing: Pentax K20D S-M-C Takumar 105/2.8 [/center]  | |
| 10-29-2010, 09:19 PM | #5699 |
|
Super Tak 35mm f/2, still at the old mill.  | |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it! |
| 200mm, adjustment, asahi, auto-takumar, camera, d2x, days, ds, eric, f3.5, f4, fisheye, flickr, focus, handle, iq, iso, k3, lens, manor, moves, nikon, pentax lens, post, results, segments, shots, subject, takumar, versions |
Post #17287 by Minimonster 
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| For Sale - Sold: Takumar: Super Takumar 135mm f3.5 includes case, hood and caps | Peter Zack | Sold Items | 7 | 05-17-2010 07:12 PM |
| Adorama is dangerous! And so is the Takumar Club! | NaClH2O | Pentax SLR Lens Discussion | 23 | 01-24-2010 09:54 AM |
| For Sale - Sold: Hard Cases for Takumar 28mm/3.5 and Takumar 135mm/2.5 | gabriel_bc | Sold Items | 8 | 01-11-2010 10:17 AM |
| For Sale - Sold: FS: Pentax-F 28/2.8; Takumar 400/5.6; Takumar 500/4.5 - pics | thePiRaTE!! | Sold Items | 5 | 03-06-2008 09:47 AM |
