Originally posted by erkie Congratulations on a job well done Mike ! It must have been a very sobering experience. I know you don't like to admit it but You do exceedingly well at preserving glimpses of life around you in artfully composed ways. Each glimpse you give the world building a clearer picture of the whole.
It's not a matter of modesty, either false or genuine. I just know stuff isn't art when it leaves my hands, nor is it intended to be. If somebody looks at something I did and can find artistic merit in it, that's just an extra added bonus.
Like all of us, I try to do each shot the best I can. What can be exasperating, though, is when people assume that there was artistic intent on each photo and critique them accordingly. In my case it is usually comments on my ship photos, which are intended solely for the eyes of a very few people who like ships and for the most part don't give a damn about photography.
Quote: If you don't believe me , just google "takumar 35/2" and see if you're not pretty well represented.
Eric
I'll let you in on a little secret.
The reason I'm pretty well represented is because I am
very diligent about tagging my photos, including lens information. Plus I use Takumars as my daily gear so what usually makes up a small portion of other people's online photos constitutes the bulk of my online photos. I come up due to tags and sheer number of photos.
Standard tags on my Takumar photos go something like this:
Pentax, Takumar, M42, screwmount, manual focus, ペンタックス, タクマー, ねじ込み......plus lens specific tags......S-M-C Takumar 35/2, 35mm
Then, of course, I will have lots of other tags depending the nature of the individual photo. You don't have to be good to show up in Google searches....you just have to make sure your photos are search engine friendly.
Pentax K20D
Takumar 105/2.8 (Preset)
Love is taking an umbrella and meeting your wife at the bus stop on a rainy day....and hanging around until she gets there even though the rain has stopped.