Thank you SpecialK !
Originally posted by KxBlaze Thanks, Ditto for you too. I never thought photographing a staircase could be so much fun.
That's true !
Originally posted by hinman I really love your shots. I noticed that you also have 21mm and 12-24. I have 15, 21 and 10-17. I won't go for 12-24 as I am not a landscape purist and I prefer something lighter. But I have to ask if I ever want to get something like Sigma 10-20mm or Tamron 10-24, will the rectilinear lens make my fish-eye hide in the corners. Distortion such as yours adds value as unique view but I am loaded with lens and I wonder if I should consider trimming my 21 and 10-17 and replace the two with a rectilinear lens such as Sigma 10-20 or Tamron 10-24.
Any comments from you and others are very welcome
Hin
Thank you !
Let's compare :
DA 12-24 f:4...........430gr.....72mm
S. 10-20 f:4-5.6.......470gr.....77mm
S. 10-20 f:3.5 HSM.....520gr.....82mm
T. 10-24 f:3.5-4.5.....405gr.....77mm
I simply love the quality of my DA 12-24. Not only for landscapes, but also for portraits, architecture, etc...
And the gain of 2mm gives you less sharpness in the corners...
Don't get confused with 10 or 12mm and 10mm fisheye. It is not the same angle (99° for 12mm, 102° for 10mm and 180° for 10mm fisheye).
I would never trade my 10-17 and/or my 21 for my 12-24 or vice-versa !
I often take my 21 if I want to be discrete or if I am on my bicycle...