Originally posted by thorswolf Thanks both for the replies.
Yeah I figured when I saw that the 60B looked like that hand shooting would be an iffy porposition at best. Thank God for regular weight training.
Let me put it another way, if you had enough funds to buy a ANY reasonably priced 300mm for a Pentax (and did not want to scour the world for the FA* f2.8), what would you choose?
The 60B can be handheld - not easily, but it works. You just need some time to get used to it, during the first weeks, the images will turn out blurred a bit (I needed app. three months, until I started to get sharp handheld images out of that lens).
All in all the best thing about a 300/2.8 in my opinion is, that you can use it with the tcs ands still retain reasonable speed for focusing. I mostly use the 60 B with either the 1.4x or 2x Pentax L converters and both work great.
So, I find a 300/2.8 preferably in principle. BUT the one caveat is, hauling that thing around. If you intend to walk with your equipment or simply make longer hikes with it, it is a real burden. For these occassions I prefer the diminutive A 300/4, which is sharp enough for my needs.
Ben