Originally posted by Mirton Hahahah, my bad, i meant 300mm f2.8, I corrected the post
Love the rendering on the K20D, its superior to K5 in my opinion. Although most people own the K-5/ii/iis a lot of them here int he forum still prefer to shoot with their K10D. What lens are you shooting these pictures with wildman, the exif says m42 or No-less!?
I for sure will appreciate K5 and later model, for birding, focussing speed and accuarcy is more important, high iso performance is also as important to me as I use to shoot at high speed for action shot and most of the time the iso can be higher than 1600. the lack of AA filter from K5-IIs and K3 is even better for sharper images. I can trade that anytime for the minor color difference of K10D/K20D.
With K10D/K20D I'll definitely cannot shoot quite a number of birds under shade such as pitta, partridges and kingfishers, even non-action shots.
K10D/K20D for landscape maybe....