Originally posted by Audi 5 cyl All true, but there is a but.
The thing is, with bird photography, based on my experience with birds (and I live from researching them), that there are two basic conditions for a good photography (or close observation).
- you need to know the biology of your subject very well and
- you need to be well hidden.
The second one being a lot more important. To illustrate this I will just say that I know people that had birds landing on them or their gear while hidden. I've tried it for scientific observations in the past and had birds behaving naturally 1-4m from me. This would have never happened in Europe without good hide, except with trained birds and some owls.
I found it difficult to shoot handheld anything longer than 300mm and, as I am an anti-tripod person, I will stay there on FF (once I get one) as well as on APS-c.
There is an alternative as well. Just go to a country where hunting is forbidden and voila, you can do bird photography with a 135mm lens. I had a Cuban Tody once on a 40cm from my nose and many other species within a medium telephoto reach.
agreed. Unfortunately, my patience for being well hidden is somewhat limited. I have so far obtained most of my bird photos by having a camera handy when the bird came to me. Learned behavior as you say is an issue
and I suspect it's the issue with the Mourning dove, which as appeared at my feeder only in the last couple of weeks. Mourning doves are common throughout the United States, but they are also recognized as a 'game bird',
that is to say--they are good to eat. I have made it a point not to eat any of them, hoping that they would get a little more trustful which seems to be occuring. when the first came I couldn't go near the window or glass door
without them taking off. but the last couple of days I've been able to get photos through the glass door.
Remote control seems to offer a great opportunity for birding as well. I got my first Stellar Jay photos by setting up my camera on a tripod on the back porch aimed at a tree stump with some bird seed on it.
I retreated inside the house by the coffee pot with my remote wireless release which sort of qualifies as well hidden and tripped the release at appropriate times. I expect the K-1 to have enhanced remote capabilities,
and if someone will make an affordable tripod that will pan and elevate remotely, which should let me remain near the coffee pot for extended periods while 'birding', as my idea of a bird blind includes hot coffee and a soft chair.
What I'm sort of sad about is the lack of power zoom. At one point Pentax developed that, but it wasn't very successful apparently and the contacts put in the lens mount for it have been reassigned. This is too bad because
a remote zoom could add another dimension to the remote photography.
---------- Post added 04-30-2016 at 09:59 PM ----------
Originally posted by dadipentak Which is why I'm not particularly excited about FF--I intend to stick with a crop sensor body for wildlife.
I was sort of holding off as well, but got to thinking of the probability of a higher price after the pre-order period closed and decided to get one.
I've carefully kept and accumulated "A" and "FA" long glass for this occasion. in the case of remote photography where the target may
not get fully in the chosen target the FF will be preferable, as you will have more to crop, but there will be trade off's to be sure.
I thought when digital photography first came out that it would never be acceptable and that I would stay with film forever, but when I got around
to buy a digital camera, I liked it so well that I never finished using the roll of film that was in my film camera. It seems that 'my thing' in photography
has been accumulating photos for my website (see my signature line) which I have been doing for about 20 years now, and digitizing film images
never was a lot of fun nor did it improve the quality in the process.
With this experience, I bravely claim that I am going to keep my K3 and use it along side of the K-1