My backyard blind has kind of turned into a lens testing place. Today's candidate up for a trial run, the K-1 with the A-400 and F 1.7x AF adapter on it. 680mm ƒ9.3.
I tend to think the 1.7x is my ultimate lens testing machine. With the K-3 and Tarmon 300 ƒ2.8 and 1.7 I get very sharp images. With the A-400 , I get images that look good up to about 2650x1600. Pixel peeping they are quite soft, but still more resolution than you need for web sized images.
The Tamron is also a joy to use with the 1.7, one finger drag MF that is almost instantaneous. The A-400 has a long throw that has to be cranked with your full hand. It's really hard to catch up with small birds using it. With the Tamron, one pinky finger on the focus ring and a small movement gets you from minimum focus to infinity almost instantly. No taking your hand off the lens and torquing again.
Even in direct sun it was hard to lock focus. That is to be expected with a lens that is ƒ9.3 wide open. But as with most long lenses, when you nail it, you get something useful.
Ignore the 780mm on the bottom of the frame, my math was really bad this morning.
I put the combo through it's paces but bottom line, I can't really recommend it. It was more work for fewer keepers, and none of the images is anywhere near the sharpness of the Tamron 300 with the same TC on a K-3. I was thinking I'd maybe use this combo when I need 1000mm and then crop to a 1000mm field of view, it's not sharp enough for that. At least it focuses on a K-1. On a K-3 I have never been able to get it to focus reliably. It's not that it's all that bad, it's just I feel the Tamron 1.7 and K-3 are much better. Having a lens rated as a 10 for sharpness on the forum ruins you for anything else.
It's amazing how sharp a 2k file taken with an average lens and TC can be reduced from 36 MP.