Originally posted by Driline This probably is not a fair question, but how does your FA 20-35 compare in Sharpness to the FA 43? I was thinking of getting a DA 21 as a nice wide lens, but the FA 20-35 is calling me
I don't think its quite as sharp, here is a shot of the FA43 with the 20-35 (taken just before and vignette added for 'style'):
Slightly different settings, possibly should have used a wider aperture. The FA43 is SO sharp around f5.6-f11 I think rather than the 20-35 lacking sharpness. I was looking at an FA20mm and DA21mm as well, discounted the FA20mm due to the silly pricing although would be ideal for me, and the DA21 Ltd for no real reason, it makes more sense to go for that but decided to hump for a 20-35 as it was available. (And FF compatible for the future....)
The 20-35 is obviously only ~30-52mm equivalent on APS-C so its not 'that' wide but close enough to 28mm I think. Its quite plasticy in terms of build, but quite solid although light. The focus/zoom rings feel a bit cheap but there is no wobble.
All my 20-35 shots so far (Most were hand held/poor light)
Pentax K-7 / FA 20-35mm F/4 - a set on Flickr
Only other thing is there is no set profile in LR 4.4 that I have for the FA 20-35mm.
Apologies if OT.