Originally posted by jgnfld Re. sensor size, I have seen pleasing UWA focal length pics done on a 645, for example, that I know would not look the same with my K-70. As you say, other issues--including individual lens foibles--remain, however
Well, a 645Z has a pixel pitch of 5.32 µm, while a K-5 (and as a consequence the K-01 and the K-30/50) has a pixel pitch of 4.77 µm, that is about the same.
But, of course, the total number of pixel is completely different, and that shows when taking into account the same viewing size.
I too have had the impression of lack of detail and resolving power, especially when shooting at 10mm.
Then I tried shooting the same scene with the 18-55 at 18mm, and I could make out finer details with the Sigma at 10mm than I could with the kit at 18mm.
So, as you say, it's more "detail compression" than resolving power... we're probably used to see certain things represented with a minimum number of pixels, and when they aren't (because they're "smaller"), we perceive a lack of detail.