Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
03-24-2011, 04:24 PM   #31
Pentaxian
Sagitta's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Maine
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,949
I went into a thread just yesterday because I felt the need to defend my Auto Sears 50mm 1.7.

The general consensus in that thread seemed to be that Sears was junk and not worth anything.

I have yet to take a bad picture with this lens that was actually due to the fault of the lens itself. It is probably by far my favorite lens that I own, and I only paid $16 for it.

First the lens in question...



The lens in the background is another qualifier for this club - its a Quantaray 400mm or 500mm prime (I own both).

Now the arguments against it being poor quality...








03-25-2011, 04:51 PM   #32
Veteran Member




Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Missouri
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 407
Nothing wrong with this sears lens !

Eric
05-15-2011, 02:57 AM   #33
Junior Member




Join Date: Mar 2011
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 42
Does Tokina SD 70-210 qualify to join this club? Here's a link to the image I posted on another thread "The Bokeh Club".
05-16-2011, 05:16 AM   #34
Junior Member




Join Date: Mar 2011
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 42
Another lens with very bad user review, Tammy 70-300 LD 1:2 macro

05-30-2011, 11:46 PM - 1 Like   #35
Pentaxian
Sagitta's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Maine
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,949
Pentax FA 28-90 in all its plasticy glory. This is my go to walkabout "replaced the kit lens" lens since it has such a nice range compared to the 18-55.

Shot these in the monochrome setting with the infrared filter on. PP to muck with levels and curves and cropping for my screen ratio and thats about it.








06-02-2011, 12:35 AM   #36
Veteran Member
fikkser's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Borlänge, Sweden
Posts: 373
I got both a Meyer domiplan 50 2,8 and a Meyer 30 3,5. Haven't used the domiplan enough to base judgement, but it's not close to a 10/10, probably 5/10.

The 30 3,5 is another story, one of my favorite m42 lenses, very sharp with soft bookeh (10 aperture blades I think).

Will provide if I remember to. My sigma mini wide blows pretty big .... Will take a few shots with it and a soligor x2 adapter. Can't be good. ^^
11-22-2011, 06:13 PM - 1 Like   #37
Senior Member
tdmsu's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 131
Taken with my free because of gift cards to Ritz lens: Quantaray 70-300 macro. I think it's a copy of the Tamron, but I could be wrong.
I was walking between the Lincoln and Washington monuments and this squirrel was about to jump through the fence and start panhandling.
Attached Images
View Picture EXIF
PENTAX K100D Super  Photo 
11-24-2011, 01:17 PM   #38
Senior Member
tdmsu's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 131
Smiling duck




Another with that cheap Quantaray zoom

11-24-2011, 01:33 PM   #39
Pentaxian
eddie1960's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Toronto
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 12,875
Here's one. Sigma Patel 300mm f5.6 came with a spotmatic, a rokinar 135 3.5 and a tak 50 1.4 for $100. Aperture does nothing so it's a fixed 5.6.
Sharp as a bag of cotton



03-11-2012, 08:09 AM   #40
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Frankfurt am Main
Posts: 1,214
Domiplan 2.8/50 and Meyer 3.5/30

I hope this thread is not dead, as I want to add some comments about the Meyer Domiplan 2.8/50 and the 3.5/30. Both were mentioned in this thread.

The Domiplan was my standard lens (with Exa500 and VX1000 bodies, and 35+135mm lenses) from 1973 through 1981. I had bought this system, as I was a student with very limited funds, and East German optics were quite cheap in West Germany. The Exa500 with the Domiplan as the kit lens were a steal, and the alternatively offered CZJ Tessar 2.8/50 would have doubled the price of the package.

The Domiplan was an improvement compared with my fixed lens cameras I had used before, and I only realized sharpness issues when, in the late seventies, poster sized prints became affordable. Up to A5, the Domiplan seemed to be OK. With slides, I could only compare with friends using Leicas, and comparing to a Summicron or Summilux would not have been a fair competition!

When I changed systems (to get TTL metering) I choose a Porst with a Porst 2/50mm, because they used the K-Bayonet. The Porst lens was a slight improvement over the Domiplan, but I think mainly because of the multi-coating. The real step up was when I changed my standard lens to a SMC Pentax-M 2/50, which was way better in sharpness, and even more in colour rendition!

So I think nowadays, when everyone can crop to pixel size on his computer monitor, you could call the Domiplan crap - in its time (beginning of the seventies), when poster sized prints were not affordable for most people, it was OK. I remember, that in my country, 4-5 of such big prints would have cost you the equivalent of a SLR with kit lens.

But in sharp contrast to all this, the Meyer 3.5/30 had a very special reputation. In East Germany (the home of CZJ!) it was known for extreme centre sharpness, and called a "bokeh king". This was different to the later 3.5/29, which they sold as an improvement, but never got even near to the reputation of the 3.5/30.

At the moment, the 3.5/30 is offered on German eBay 3-4 times every week (about 50% m42, 50% Exakta bayonet); it seems every East German with a SLR also owned it, and now realizes it still has some value. These vastly increased number of offerings may be the only reason why the price has not doubled (yet) over the last 12 months.

I think the Domiplan 2.8/50 may qualify for this thread, the Meyer/Pentacon 3.5/30 (Meyer became integrated to the Pentacon group) certainly not!
02-26-2019, 09:08 PM   #41
Moderator
Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
MarkJerling's Avatar

Join Date: May 2012
Location: Wairarapa, New Zealand
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 10,411
I've re-opened this thread as the other thread created for the same sort of thing got no posts at all. I've therefore deleted that thread and re-opened this one.
02-27-2019, 01:33 PM - 1 Like   #42
Pentaxian
zzeitg's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: South Bohemia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,427
Tokina 20-35mm


Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
club, criteria, dl, f4.5-6.7, lens, lenses, pentax lens, photography, post, review, reviews
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DCL (dirt cheap lens) Club whitedogone Lens Clubs 168 04-22-2019 04:36 PM
The "Cheap AF 28ish-80ish zoom lens" club Steve Beswick Lens Clubs 152 03-19-2019 11:59 AM
Macro Raynox 250 + Cheap 'n Nasty Sigma DL 100-300 Christopher M.W.T Post Your Photos! 20 04-03-2010 01:38 PM
For Sale - Sold: [Worldwide] Legendary SMC K 135mm f2.5 (not the inferior "Takumar") cheekygeek Sold Items 4 03-05-2010 06:04 AM
Cheap manual lens on cheap extension tube with cheap flash! Also cats. pasipasi Post Your Photos! 12 08-28-2008 04:43 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:23 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top