FWIW, the all-knowing Wikipedia places the FOV of the human eye at 95 degrees, not counting peripheral vision (
Human eye - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia). That's one eye, I guess, not binocular. Of course, peripheral vision isn't an all-or-nothing thing. It's a gradual falloff, not a sudden cutoff. Another source I found in a search puts non-peripheral bincoluar vision at 100 degrees, another 120, another still 140. But measures that take resolution and other factors into consideration peg vision at a much narrower range - 50 degrees, for example.
If there one's thing clear from a small amount of research, it's that there is no One True Measure of the FOV of human vision, no matter how objectively one tries to define it.
The DA15 at 86 degrees might not match any particular existing objective measure, but I'm talking about something more subjective. Even going down the DA14 and its 90 degree FOV, I have a distinct feeling that I am taking in more with the camera than with my eyes, despite what some objective test might tell me I really was seeing (but apparently not at the level of acuity I am thinking of).
Anyhow, given the subjective nature of all this, it doesn't surprise me that others might not see things the way I do, but again, I think the fact that it fits so well *for* me has a lot to do with why this has become my most used lens.