Originally posted by deadwolfbones It's due to the number of aperture blades and the arrangement of the optical elements, as I understand it.
Yes, you need a small sized "aperture hole" to get the diffraction of the light on the edges of the hole at the the intersection of the blades. At the corners the light spreads inwards to the centre of the lens and also outwards to the outer edge of the lens element.
The star point pattern you get depends on the number of aperture blades.
At each "corner" of the blade intersection, the ray or streak goes in both directions across the lens element.
The DA15 has 7 blades so with the rays going both ways you get a 14-pointed star.
With a lens with 8 apeture blades (an even number) you only get 8 pointed stars this is because the the rays/streaks going in opposite directions from each "corner" will line up with the ones on the oppostie side of the aperture corners. This give the appearance of only 8 streaks instead of 16.
A DA16-50 has a very small apeture opening especially at 16mm when stopped down and it has 9 aperture blades.
This lens can do really nice 18-point stars.
The great thing about the DA15 is its resistance to flaring so you can get the lovely star patterns without all of the distracting flare reflections on the picture.
Note: the star effect works better with wide angle lense because it has a smaller apeture hole (for the incoming light) than a telephoto lens at the same f-number. You probably couldnt get this effect with a DA300 at f22 but you can nicely with a DA15 at f16.
If you have a long zoom lens handy take the caps off and look through the front element at the widest angle setting. The apeture blades are efectively stopped down with the lens off the camera and the apeture is quite small but if you zoom the lens longer the appearance of the apeture is much larger so is less likely to produces this diffaction effect.
I hope that make sense, it sounded a little confusing when re-reading, and i was the one that wrote it