Originally posted by maxfield_photo I had tried the setup you describe back when just the V5s were available, and the flashes fired, but did not illuminate the frame at all.
The setup would work with a V5-only setup if the flashes used were RF60. The latter provide a delay feature just like the V6. With regular flashes, one needs to use V6 receivers to delay their output.
Without a delay of the flash output, the flashes will always fire significantly too early due to the camera's shutter lag.
Originally posted by maxfield_photo I'm under the impression that with hypersyncing the goal is to avoid the peak of the flash's output and just capture the tail due to the unevenness of illumination that the peak will cause as the shutter curtains traverse the sensor.
That's correct.
With the setup I described (but also by using optical triggering) you can choose to keep as much or little (including none) of the output peak in.
Note that the shutter curtains move downwards which means -- considering the upside-down image projected by the lens -- that uneven illumination as in the HyperSync technique will cause the bottom of the frame to be more illuminated than the top.
This can be useful outdoors when the top part of the image is featuring sky and does not need any flash illumination anyhow.
Originally posted by maxfield_photo Can you comment on the evenness of the illumination you're getting, or even post a picture of, oh, maybe a solid colored wall?
The evenness depends on when you fire the flash. The farther away you get from the peak, the more even it will be, but the weaker overall it will become as well.
The light fall-off after the peak is exponential so you shouldn't expect anything close to even illumination. I'm currently too busy to prepare any demonstration of the effect, but you should be able to produce these images yourself.
Originally posted by maxfield_photo I'm wondering which method, Sympathetic HSS or Hypersyncing, provides the most daylight-killing power?
I'm pretty sure it is HSS.
If you avoid the peak when using HyperSync then you lose a lot of the output.
HSS means that the flash produces continuous bursts of light at the appropriate output level.
BTW, for both HyperSync and HSS, the flash's contribution to exposure will be diminished by increasing shutter speed. So if you increase shutter speed to combat daylight then you are also reducing the contribution of the flash. At, or below, the sync-speed, the flash can always illuminate the full frame, independently of the shutter speed. That is no longer true when the sync-speed is exceeded and further reductions in shutter speed are achieved by decreasing the size of the slit defined by the first and the second curtain.
Originally posted by maxfield_photo And which provides the most useable results?
I haven't run any respective tests, but I'm pretty sure that HSS is the better technique in general as it provides more even illumination.
See above, though, for when uneven illumination may not pose a problem.
You may also use a graduated filter to compensate for uneven illumination. Unless you confine the effect to elements near the flash, however, you will probably introduce a funny looking gradient for the background, as the flash's contribution will be much stronger on elements close to it (inverse square law effect).