Originally posted by mcgregni That's getting down to what it's all about. I've lost count of the number of times I've read a forum member (not here so much) say that they never need flash now, because their camera has such good high ISO performance and they can raise the shadows and reveal details without too much noise ....
Yes, those who say they don't need flash because their camera can handle high ISO and doing a better job than using flash probably don't know better... the majority of them are from the other camp with big and expensive cameras. They can claim "pro" status whatever they want... doesn't bother me, but I am just be happy with mine so are my customers. LOL.
---------- Post added 08-16-2016 at 05:56 PM ----------
Yes, I agree and I am sure some (if not most) church services do not allow flash... and I can understand why... As a photographer, I need to find ways to do that when the lighting is inadequate... another case when it is almost completely dark (backstage) and very high back ceiling, with no walls to bounce flash..... here's one that I bounce the flash off my hand (no way I can do it with a heavy Canikon camera). IMO, it would be difficult to get the same photo with similar color as the one here without using flash.