Originally posted by lithedreamer I compared the released specs on B&H's page, and the main benefits seem to be some better support for HSS with the V6 II triggers, and much faster refresh times.
I had no idea that there are already official listings for the RF60x; thanks for pointing it out!
I'm not sure what makes you think that it has better support for HSS (with the V6II). The RF60 (with the latest V2.04 firmware update) already supports HSS with the V6II and PowerSync as well. They couldn't improve HSS support, if they tried.
Are you perhaps misreading the note about the "AF assist light" support to be about HSS?
From the info available on the listing, I think the following features are new (compared to the RF60):
- "Cooling mode": The RF60 has an overheating protection system already; this looks like a mode that attempts to stop overheating from occuring in the first place.
- Quicker recycling: If they are using the same measurement method then the recycling is 2.6 times faster. With Eneloops, I never needed 5s for recycling after a full power shot (~3.2s), so the quoted 1.9s may even be less when using Eneloops (rather than standard batteries).
- AF-assist light: Will most likely just activate in conjunction with a V6II as on off-camera AF-assist light. Anything else would require a system-specific hot-shoe and the specs don't mention that.
- Different Display: Seems like it will use the same "blue on dark" display as the V6II. From my measurements with the V6II, it uses less power when on, but always needs to be on, whereas the RF60's display also worked without a back-light.
Too bad they kept the 270°swivel range. I came up with a DIY tweak for the RF60 that easily extends that range and it shouldn't be hard to construct a mechanism that supports a 360° swivel range. Being able to tilt down the head (when front-facing) can also be handy at times. These limitations are not biggies, but not having them can be handy at times.
Originally posted by lithedreamer Oh, hey! You're the guy who wrote the RF60 article for PF, right?
Yes, I am.
Originally posted by lithedreamer Thank you for that! It's part of what got me into flash photography, oddly enough.
Much appreciated!
Although it was a lot of work, I had fun writing it. At the time I had seen many on the forum express that they don't need anything but an on-camera flash, hence my little excursion at the beginning of the review as to why taking one's flash off-camera is such a good idea.