For curiosity, I have R930, V6II, X1N all for review.

jake14mw · 12-31-2016, 06:24 AM - **1 Like**

I asked the same question in the "tiger tank" thread. Andy answered, but I could not understand his reply. Then he deleted his response. By his responses here, it looks like he is pleading the fifth.

andy888 · 12-31-2016, 06:52 AM

clackers
ClassA(jake14mw or some else)
mcgregni

Who ever behind the ID.

I am so seriously suspicious you to be paid to speak unfair too. for you challenge me .

You should one by one go through the test. who is first? swear under the name of God. or anything he make as "God", who?

Swear you are not paid to challenge acon or me? Who? come out. Swear yours first, then you can challenge me.

----
I made so many video and make test, to prove fact. because I tired of words without stuff.

which you ( no matter IDs or person) would not face be turn to personal.

Base on personal but not test result or anything else to "debate", I don't like to do this.

Class A · 12-31-2016, 10:53 AM

Originally posted by andy888

You should one by one go through the test. who is first?

How about you go first?

Of the eleven (11) threads you have started on this forum, eleven (100%) are about promoting Acon triggers. Your very first post on this forum was about Acon triggers. You hardly talk about anything else.

Providing information about a new product is great and appreciated by many forum members but you go beyond informing others about the features of your triggers. You denigrate other products in highly unfair ways. You often do not respond when your positions or alleged proofs are questioned. Now, all that could be your own opinion and your prerogative to answer the questions you feel like answering, if you are simply a private person with no affiliation to Acon. However, if you are affiliated to Acon you are abusing the forum for promotion and are intentionally misleading forum members.

You have been asked by at least three different people what your affiliation to Acon is and always dodged the question. Now you are asking even others to swear about their own identity. This is not about the identity of anyone else but whether or not you are affiliated with Acon.

Originally posted by andy888

I am so seriously suspicious you to be paid to speak unfair too.

What do you mean by "too"?
Who is the other person being "paid" to "speak unfair"? You?

I'm 100% certain that none of the people you attacked is doing anything but voicing their private opinion, of course without receiving payment. What kind of idea is is being paid to post on a forum anyway? What makes you think that this happens anywhere?

AFAIC, you are overstepping the boundary by implying that paulster is an imposter or sock puppet. AFAIC, you are overstepping the boundary by attacking paulster, clackers, jake14mw, mcgregni, and myself. You called some of them "strong user". Strong user? None of them have started eleven threads to promote a product and denigrate others!

AFAIC, you had already overstepped the boundary when you alleged that I'm Chinese. I do not take offence regarding "Chinese" -- I've had the pleasure of meeting a number of great Chinese people -- but I feel affronted by the implication that I am pretending to have a different nationality and that I am hiding an affiliation with Cactus. I am not an imposter and I don't have any affiliation with Cactus, other than having become a beta testing regular for them.

Just stop your allegations, OK?
IMHO, you are not doing yourself (and your triggers) any favours by lashing out like that.

mcgregni · 12-31-2016, 10:57 AM - **1 Like**

I won't swear for you Andy, but I can honestly declare that I am not paid by anyone for anything photography related (it would be cool if I was!) . I have no interest here other than to help us try to understand better the 'usage cases' for the different triggers we have available as choices, and ultimately I hope to form a better understanding of things so that I can improve the summaries and advice on trigger systems that I write about in my 'Pentax Flash Guide'. So I am always looking with interest at your posts.

But recently you have been losing credibility because the comparisons' you are making seem to have a deliberate anti-Cactus agenda. I said It earlier, but I'll say it again, in my view the 'user case' for each product is very different. From a practical operating and working technical approach point of view they don't even compete, I believe. Therefore your comparisons have little point to them, I feel. Regardless of your own interest here, I feel you would be better making the effort to more clearly demonstrate reliable and consistent operation for multi-flash uses, both P-TTL and Manual, rather than trying to find minor technical differences with the Cactus system.

Last edited by mcgregni; 12-31-2016 at 11:03 AM.

**clackers** · 12-31-2016, 12:47 PM

Originally posted by andy888

clackers
ClassA(jake14mw or some else)
mcgregni

Who ever behind the ID.

I am so seriously suspicious you to be paid to speak unfair too. for you challenge me .

You should one by one go through the test. who is first? swear under the name of God. or anything he make as "God", who?

Swear you are not paid to challenge acon or me? Who? come out. Swear yours first, then you can challenge me.
.

Yep, I swear.

Now it is your turn ... what is your connection to Acon?

jake14mw · 12-31-2016, 02:56 PM - **1 Like**

I saw Andy's silly question to me 5 minutes after he posted it. I chose not to respond.

paulster · 12-31-2016, 03:52 PM

Originally posted by clackers

This is a very important issue. You may in fact be acting unethically by promoting products on this forum.

Actually, it's a legal issue. This forum is hosted in the USA, and the Federal Trade Commission enacted legislation which means that product endorsers and reviewers have a legal obligation to reveal whether they are paid (monetarily or in goods and/or services) for the reviews/blog posts/etc. that they make.

The posts from Andy would seem to suggest a relationship closer with the manufacturer than a casual customer who is happy they've found a great product and is espousing its value.

My other question is whether the Acon can genuinely do something that the Cactus (and seemingly every other trigger out there) can't do, which is to control power manually from the trigger whilst avoiding the pre-flash when the flash is in TTL mode. If Acon have cracked this then I'll be pushing Cactus to up their game and follow suit, because that would be a benefit for their customer base generally.

I have no relationship with Cactus whatsoever, though, other than being a paying customer. I paid retail for my triggers, and chose them simply because it was a means of unlocking HSS on my 645Z and would play nicely with speedlights and strobes.

You'll notice that I shoot a 645Z and have mentioned this in other posts. Class A shoots a K-1 if I recall correctly, so we're shooting two different cameras on two different sides of the world. The only thing we have in common, I think, is that we're both likely to spell colour with a 'u' because I'm British and he's in New Zealand.

andy888 · 12-31-2016, 06:18 PM

Originally posted by clackers

Yep, I swear.

Now it is your turn ... what is your connection to Acon?

Fine,Clarker swear under the name of God.

I conveyed fact about "fake manual", "delay time", and many more through fact. you only want to know "connected"?

1/3 past. who is next!?

---------- Post added 12-31-16 at 06:28 PM ----------

Originally posted by paulster

Actually, it's a legal issue. This forum is hosted in the USA, and the Federal Trade Commission enacted legislation which means that product endorsers and reviewers have a legal obligation to reveal whether they are paid (monetarily or in goods and/or services) for the reviews/blog posts/etc. that they make.

The posts from Andy would seem to suggest a relationship closer with the manufacturer than a casual customer who is happy they've found a great product and is espousing its value.

My other question is whether the Acon can genuinely do something that the Cactus (and seemingly every other trigger out there) can't do, which is to control power manually from the trigger whilst avoiding the pre-flash when the flash is in TTL mode. If Acon have cracked this then I'll be pushing Cactus to up their game and follow suit, because that would be a benefit for their customer base generally.

I have no relationship with Cactus whatsoever, though, other than being a paying customer. I paid retail for my triggers, and chose them simply because it was a means of unlocking HSS on my 645Z and would play nicely with speedlights and strobes.

You'll notice that I shoot a 645Z and have mentioned this in other posts. Class A shoots a K-1 if I recall correctly, so we're shooting two different cameras on two different sides of the world. The only thing we have in common, I think, is that we're both likely to spell colour with a 'u' because I'm British and he's in New Zealand.

This ID, come by owning a 645Z, then go to the topics...

Well, carefully examine the ClassA, (who come from Cactus's own forums and actively explain things, who state "not connected")(state New Zealand),
this ID(state USA)
word styles...I suspect you are the same man behind.

paulster · 12-31-2016, 06:31 PM

It'd be far simpler if you just answered the question: what is your relationship with Acon?

You have zero credibility with me at the moment, and you're seemingly digging a hole here unnecessarily.

andy888 · 12-31-2016, 06:42 PM

Originally posted by paulster

It'd be far simpler if you just answered the question: what is your relationship with Acon?

You have zero credibility with me at the moment, and you're seemingly digging a hole here unnecessarily.

" zero credibility ", so familiar as Class A" zero foundation" said.

You or ClassA，are more suspicious related to Cactus. Why not just swear too to help the answer.

Again , One ID response, Thanks!

paulster · 12-31-2016, 06:46 PM

I've told you. I own three Cactus products (2x V6 II and 1x V6). All of which I paid retail.

I swear I'm a customer and nothing else. Now what about you?

andy888 · 12-31-2016, 06:56 PM

Originally posted by paulster

I've told you. I own three Cactus products (2x V6 II and 1x V6). All of which I paid retail.

I swear I'm a customer and nothing else. Now what about you?

By what name you swear? I suggest Cantonese style for you. for whom you care for example. will you?

paulster · 12-31-2016, 07:08 PM

This is getting ridiculous. On a US-hosted forum you have a legal obligation to disclose if you have any sort of relationship with Acon, and yet you continue to refuse to do so.

As far as I'm concerned you have zero credibility now, particularly as you won't answer my questions about the functionality of the Acon products.

You're a shill.

Happy New Year to everyone else in this thread.

andy888 · 12-31-2016, 07:09 PM

Originally posted by mcgregni

I won't swear for you Andy, but I can honestly declare that I am not paid by anyone for anything photography related (it would be cool if I was!) . I have no interest here other than to help us try to understand better the 'usage cases' for the different triggers we have available as choices, and ultimately I hope to form a better understanding of things so that I can improve the summaries and advice on trigger systems that I write about in my 'Pentax Flash Guide'. So I am always looking with interest at your posts.

But recently you have been losing credibility because the comparisons' you are making seem to have a deliberate anti-Cactus agenda. I said It earlier, but I'll say it again, in my view the 'user case' for each product is very different. From a practical operating and working technical approach point of view they don't even compete, I believe. Therefore your comparisons have little point to them, I feel. Regardless of your own interest here, I feel you would be better making the effort to more clearly demonstrate reliable and consistent operation for multi-flash uses, both P-TTL and Manual, rather than trying to find minor technical differences with the Cactus system.

Not swear and, Honestly. ..

I am open for critics, and I gladly added the UI video for your request. Because I stated "fair".

---------- Post added 12-31-16 at 07:14 PM ----------

Originally posted by paulster

This is getting ridiculous. On a US-hosted forum you have a legal obligation to disclose if you have any sort of relationship with Acon, and yet you continue to refuse to do so.

As far as I'm concerned you have zero credibility now, particularly as you won't answer my questions about the functionality of the Acon products.

You're a shill.

Happy New Year to everyone else in this thread.

Shill is better than you.^_^

Happy new year to other viewer.

Because you swear, It should be understood that base on your religion, for example for Cantonese, under the name of the one you love.

I don't refuse but you should go past test because you challenge me.

[BTW, it is Class A asked the same "functionality" exactly like this ID and same "ask cactus", So you both seems the same people, who accuse other as shill...

---------- Post added 12-31-16 at 07:32 PM ----------

So right here, the man behind ID paulster (whom I belive is ClassA ID owner), Swear, Base on his religion, (if he is of Cantonese, under the name of the one he love). said that words with swear...

Class A · 12-31-2016, 07:37 PM

Originally posted by andy888

Well, carefully examine the ClassA, (who come from Cactus's own forums and actively explain things, who state "not connected")

I don't "come from Cactus's own forums". Cactus maintain a community forum to which I contribute. I already explained earlier that through beta testing I get to know a product pretty well and I am glad when I can pass on some of my knowledge or experience to others.

I'd be a rubbish employee if my task were to work on the Cactus community forum because I only contribute now and then. When the V6 was introduced, I posted a lot more because I was in a position to help but recently most new posts on the community forum are about Fuji and other brands which I don't have any experience with.

Originally posted by andy888

word styles...I suspect you are the same man behind.

Do you realise that are insulting not only paulster and me but also implicate Cactus as a company?

Paulster posts to the Cactus community forum as well. I know because we happened to post to the same thread about the Priolite MBX500. That means, you are not only claiming that paulster and I are the same person, you are also stating that Cactus as a company is condoning sock puppetry on their community forum! Again, you are completely out of line with this nonsense.

Pentaxforums moderators could probably easily confirm that paulster and I connect from different parts of the world and are not the same person. But this really is not about anyone but you.

Originally posted by andy888

...you only want to know "connected"?

Yes, several people (including me) would like to know. You may not think it is an important question but to us it is important.

Several people responded to your request to swear, and you are still denying them an answer. An explicit, written answer, that is.

12-31-2016, 06:52 AM	#47
andy888 Banned Join Date: May 2016 Posts: 181 Original Poster	clackers ClassA(jake14mw or some else) mcgregni Who ever behind the ID. I am so seriously suspicious you to be paid to speak unfair too. for you challenge me . You should one by one go through the test. who is first? swear under the name of God. or anything he make as "God", who? Swear you are not paid to challenge acon or me? Who? come out. Swear yours first, then you can challenge me. ---- I made so many video and make test, to prove fact. because I tired of words without stuff. which you ( no matter IDs or person) would not face be turn to personal. Base on personal but not test result or anything else to "debate", I don't like to do this. Last edited by andy888; 12-31-2016 at 08:55 AM.

12-31-2016, 06:18 PM	#53
andy888 Banned Join Date: May 2016 Posts: 181 Original Poster	Originally posted by clackers Yep, I swear. *Now it is your turn ... what is your connection to Acon?* Fine,Clarker swear under the name of God. I conveyed fact about "fake manual", "delay time", and many more through fact. you only want to know "connected"? 1/3 past. who is next!? ---------- Post added 12-31-16 at 06:28 PM ---------- Originally posted by paulster Actually, it's a legal issue. This forum is hosted in the USA, and the Federal Trade Commission enacted legislation which means that product endorsers and reviewers have a legal obligation to reveal whether they are paid (monetarily or in goods and/or services) for the reviews/blog posts/etc. that they make. The posts from Andy would seem to suggest a relationship closer with the manufacturer than a casual customer who is happy they've found a great product and is espousing its value. My other question is whether the Acon can genuinely do something that the Cactus (and seemingly every other trigger out there) can't do, which is to control power manually from the trigger whilst avoiding the pre-flash when the flash is in TTL mode. If Acon have cracked this then I'll be pushing Cactus to up their game and follow suit, because that would be a benefit for their customer base generally. I have no relationship with Cactus whatsoever, though, other than being a paying customer. I paid retail for my triggers, and chose them simply because it was a means of unlocking HSS on my 645Z and would play nicely with speedlights and strobes. You'll notice that I shoot a 645Z and have mentioned this in other posts. Class A shoots a K-1 if I recall correctly, so we're shooting two different cameras on two different sides of the world. The only thing we have in common, I think, is that we're both likely to spell colour with a 'u' because I'm British and he's in New Zealand. This ID, come by owning a 645Z, then go to the topics... Well, carefully examine the ClassA, (who come from Cactus's own forums and actively explain things, who state "not connected")(state New Zealand), this ID(state USA) word styles...I suspect you are the same man behind. Last edited by andy888; 12-31-2016 at 07:00 PM.

12-31-2016, 07:09 PM	#59
andy888 Banned Join Date: May 2016 Posts: 181 Original Poster	Originally posted by mcgregni I won't swear for you Andy, but I can honestly declare that I am not paid by anyone for anything photography related (it would be cool if I was!) . I have no interest here other than to help us try to understand better the 'usage cases' for the different triggers we have available as choices, and ultimately I hope to form a better understanding of things so that I can improve the summaries and advice on trigger systems that I write about in my 'Pentax Flash Guide'. So I am always looking with interest at your posts. But recently you have been losing credibility because the comparisons' you are making seem to have a deliberate anti-Cactus agenda. I said It earlier, but I'll say it again, in my view the 'user case' for each product is very different. From a practical operating and working technical approach point of view they don't even compete, I believe. Therefore your comparisons have little point to them, I feel. Regardless of your own interest here, I feel you would be better making the effort to more clearly demonstrate reliable and consistent operation for multi-flash uses, both P-TTL and Manual, rather than trying to find minor technical differences with the Cactus system. Not swear and, Honestly. .. I am open for critics, and I gladly added the UI video for your request. Because I stated "fair". ---------- Post added 12-31-16 at 07:14 PM ---------- Originally posted by paulster This is getting ridiculous. On a US-hosted forum you have a legal obligation to disclose if you have any sort of relationship with Acon, and yet you continue to refuse to do so. As far as I'm concerned you have zero credibility now, particularly as you won't answer my questions about the functionality of the Acon products. You're a shill. Happy New Year to everyone else in this thread. Shill is better than you.^_^ Happy new year to other viewer. Because you swear, It should be understood that base on your religion, for example for Cantonese, under the name of the one you love. I don't refuse but you should go past test because you challenge me. [BTW, it is Class A asked the same "functionality" exactly like this ID and same "ask cactus", So you both seems the same people, who accuse other as shill... ---------- Post added 12-31-16 at 07:32 PM ---------- So right here, the man behind ID paulster (whom I belive is ClassA ID owner), Swear, Base on his religion, (if he is of Cantonese, under the name of the one he love). said that words with swear... Last edited by andy888; 12-31-2016 at 09:06 PM.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Cactus V6II with Fuji Review	Class A	Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands	2	07-15-2016 07:46 AM
Acon R930: HSS question - Do I have my settings right?	howieb101	Flashes, Lighting, and Studio	11	05-13-2016 08:36 AM
Acquired an mx with takumar. I have no desire for it. What should I do?	swanlefitte	Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras	15	04-02-2016 03:34 PM
Question Official K-3 review? Sticky for questions we have?	PBandJ	Site Suggestions and Help	2	11-01-2013 11:08 AM
Abstract The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity.	jsherman999	Post Your Photos!	37	01-31-2011 01:28 AM

12-31-2016, 06:24 AM - 1 Like	#46
jake14mw Veteran Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Connecticut, USA Posts: 977	I asked the same question in the "tiger tank" thread. Andy answered, but I could not understand his reply. Then he deleted his response. By his responses here, it looks like he is pleading the fifth.

12-31-2016, 10:53 AM	#48
Class A Pentaxian Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Wellington, New Zealand Posts: 11,251	Originally posted by andy888 You should one by one go through the test. who is first? How about you go first? Of the eleven (11) threads you have started on this forum, eleven (100%) are about promoting Acon triggers. Your very first post on this forum was about Acon triggers. You hardly talk about anything else. Providing information about a new product is great and appreciated by many forum members but you go beyond informing others about the features of your triggers. You denigrate other products in highly unfair ways. You often do not respond when your positions or alleged proofs are questioned. Now, all that could be your own opinion and your prerogative to answer the questions you feel like answering, if you are simply a private person with no affiliation to Acon. However, if you are affiliated to Acon you are abusing the forum for promotion and are intentionally misleading forum members. You have been asked by at least three different people what your affiliation to Acon is and always dodged the question. Now you are asking even others to swear about their own identity. This is not about the identity of anyone else but whether or not you are affiliated with Acon. Originally posted by andy888 I am so seriously suspicious you to be paid to speak unfair too. What do you mean by "too"? Who is the other person being "paid" to "speak unfair"? You? I'm 100% certain that none of the people you attacked is doing anything but voicing their private opinion, of course without receiving payment. What kind of idea is is being paid to post on a forum anyway? What makes you think that this happens anywhere? AFAIC, you are overstepping the boundary by implying that paulster is an imposter or sock puppet. AFAIC, you are overstepping the boundary by attacking paulster, clackers, jake14mw, mcgregni, and myself. You called some of them "strong user". Strong user? None of them have started eleven threads to promote a product and denigrate others! AFAIC, you had already overstepped the boundary when you alleged that I'm Chinese. I do not take offence regarding "Chinese" -- I've had the pleasure of meeting a number of great Chinese people -- but I feel affronted by the implication that I am pretending to have a different nationality and that I am hiding an affiliation with Cactus. I am not an imposter and I don't have any affiliation with Cactus, other than having become a beta testing regular for them. Just stop your allegations, OK? IMHO, you are not doing yourself (and your triggers) any favours by lashing out like that.

12-31-2016, 10:57 AM - 1 Like	#49
mcgregni Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: Surrey, England Posts: 2,603	I won't swear for you Andy, but I can honestly declare that I am not paid by anyone for anything photography related (it would be cool if I was!) . I have no interest here other than to help us try to understand better the 'usage cases' for the different triggers we have available as choices, and ultimately I hope to form a better understanding of things so that I can improve the summaries and advice on trigger systems that I write about in my 'Pentax Flash Guide'. So I am always looking with interest at your posts. But recently you have been losing credibility because the comparisons' you are making seem to have a deliberate anti-Cactus agenda. I said It earlier, but I'll say it again, in my view the 'user case' for each product is very different. From a practical operating and working technical approach point of view they don't even compete, I believe. Therefore your comparisons have little point to them, I feel. Regardless of your own interest here, I feel you would be better making the effort to more clearly demonstrate reliable and consistent operation for multi-flash uses, both P-TTL and Manual, rather than trying to find minor technical differences with the Cactus system. Last edited by mcgregni; 12-31-2016 at 11:03 AM.

12-31-2016, 12:47 PM	#50
clackers Otis Memorial Pentaxian Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: Melbourne Photos: Albums Posts: 16,397	Originally posted by andy888 clackers ClassA(jake14mw or some else) mcgregni Who ever behind the ID. I am so seriously suspicious you to be paid to speak unfair too. for you challenge me . You should one by one go through the test. who is first? swear under the name of God. or anything he make as "God", who? Swear you are not paid to challenge acon or me? Who? come out. Swear yours first, then you can challenge me. . Yep, I swear. *Now it is your turn ... what is your connection to Acon?*

12-31-2016, 02:56 PM - 1 Like	#51
jake14mw Veteran Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Connecticut, USA Posts: 977	I saw Andy's silly question to me 5 minutes after he posted it. I chose not to respond.

12-31-2016, 03:52 PM	#52
paulster Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2016 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 159	Originally posted by clackers This is a very important issue. You may in fact be acting unethically by promoting products on this forum. Actually, it's a legal issue. This forum is hosted in the USA, and the Federal Trade Commission enacted legislation which means that product endorsers and reviewers have a legal obligation to reveal whether they are paid (monetarily or in goods and/or services) for the reviews/blog posts/etc. that they make. The posts from Andy would seem to suggest a relationship closer with the manufacturer than a casual customer who is happy they've found a great product and is espousing its value. My other question is whether the Acon can genuinely do something that the Cactus (and seemingly every other trigger out there) can't do, which is to control power manually from the trigger whilst avoiding the pre-flash when the flash is in TTL mode. If Acon have cracked this then I'll be pushing Cactus to up their game and follow suit, because that would be a benefit for their customer base generally. I have no relationship with Cactus whatsoever, though, other than being a paying customer. I paid retail for my triggers, and chose them simply because it was a means of unlocking HSS on my 645Z and would play nicely with speedlights and strobes. You'll notice that I shoot a 645Z and have mentioned this in other posts. Class A shoots a K-1 if I recall correctly, so we're shooting two different cameras on two different sides of the world. The only thing we have in common, I think, is that we're both likely to spell colour with a 'u' because I'm British and he's in New Zealand.

12-31-2016, 06:31 PM	#54
paulster Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2016 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 159	It'd be far simpler if you just answered the question: what is your relationship with Acon? You have zero credibility with me at the moment, and you're seemingly digging a hole here unnecessarily.

12-31-2016, 06:42 PM	#55
andy888 Banned Join Date: May 2016 Posts: 181 Original Poster	Originally posted by paulster It'd be far simpler if you just answered the question: what is your relationship with Acon? You have zero credibility with me at the moment, and you're seemingly digging a hole here unnecessarily. " zero credibility ", so familiar as Class A" zero foundation" said. You or ClassA，are more suspicious related to Cactus. Why not just swear too to help the answer. Again , One ID response, Thanks!

12-31-2016, 06:46 PM	#56
paulster Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2016 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 159	I've told you. I own three Cactus products (2x V6 II and 1x V6). All of which I paid retail. I swear I'm a customer and nothing else. Now what about you?

12-31-2016, 06:56 PM	#57
andy888 Banned Join Date: May 2016 Posts: 181 Original Poster	Originally posted by paulster I've told you. I own three Cactus products (2x V6 II and 1x V6). All of which I paid retail. I swear I'm a customer and nothing else. Now what about you? By what name you swear? I suggest Cantonese style for you. for whom you care for example. will you?

12-31-2016, 07:08 PM	#58
paulster Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2016 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 159	This is getting ridiculous. On a US-hosted forum you have a legal obligation to disclose if you have any sort of relationship with Acon, and yet you continue to refuse to do so. As far as I'm concerned you have zero credibility now, particularly as you won't answer my questions about the functionality of the Acon products. You're a shill. Happy New Year to everyone else in this thread.

12-31-2016, 07:37 PM	#60
Class A Pentaxian Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Wellington, New Zealand Posts: 11,251	Originally posted by andy888 Well, carefully examine the ClassA, (who come from Cactus's own forums and actively explain things, who state "not connected") I don't "come from Cactus's own forums". Cactus maintain a community forum to which I contribute. I already explained earlier that through beta testing I get to know a product pretty well and I am glad when I can pass on some of my knowledge or experience to others. I'd be a rubbish employee if my task were to work on the Cactus community forum because I only contribute now and then. When the V6 was introduced, I posted a lot more because I was in a position to help but recently most new posts on the community forum are about Fuji and other brands which I don't have any experience with. Originally posted by andy888 word styles...I suspect you are the same man behind. Do you realise that are insulting not only paulster and me but also implicate Cactus as a company? Paulster posts to the Cactus community forum as well. I know because we happened to post to the same thread about the Priolite MBX500. That means, you are not only claiming that paulster and I are the same person, you are also stating that Cactus as a company is condoning sock puppetry on their community forum! Again, you are completely out of line with this nonsense. Pentaxforums moderators could probably easily confirm that paulster and I connect from different parts of the world and are not the same person. But this really is not about anyone but you. Originally posted by andy888 ...you only want to know "connected"? Yes, several people (including me) would like to know. You may not think it is an important question but to us it is important. Several people responded to your request to swear, and you are still denying them an answer. An explicit, written answer, that is.