Originally posted by andy888 I am asked but not paid to convey test against the mis info by many IDs.
The only person I know of spreading misinformation on this forum is you. Provide one concrete example of anyone else stating something incorrectly in this context. People here are just curious and ask questions concerning the capabilities of the triggers. Yet, they are denied the most basic information and instead get dished up some nonsenses about the V6II plus preposterous and insulting conspiracy theories about posters on this forum.
Originally posted by andy888 I am provided any info or data from acon.
So why are the people here, with their questions about Acon triggers, not getting answers?
Why don't you just tell us what the deal is with pre-flashes and remotely controlling power with Acon triggers? Where is the problem in answering that question?
Originally posted by andy888 I did it for curiosity and justice.
You are not answering the most basic questions about your "
fair" comparisons.
If your intent were to clarify misunderstandings you'd be answering all questions pertaining to the circumstances of your "tests". Yet, you choose to remain silent most of the time.
In one of your very first comparison tables, the criteria were totally biased towards Acon. How is that combating "
misinformation"?
You present latency measurements but then refuse to answer any question pertaining to the real world relevance of your measurements. What did we learn from this? That three trigger all fully illuminate the frame at all shutter speeds and that there is one hypothetical one (that you initially referred to as the "PocketWizard Plus III" but then retracted that) which does not? That's it? But you nevertheless assign different star ratings based on apparently irrelevant measurements?
Why don't you tell us what you are doing off-camera with the V6II receiver and flash before you put it on the table again?
Why don't you tell us how on earth you could honestly believe that what you have presented as video evidence about the lack of Cactus reliability could be representative of how the V6II really performs? Everyone who has used a V6II knows that what you are showing is a joke. And you call that a service to "
justice"?!?
Please confirm that you are not benefiting from increased sales of Acon products.
Please also confirm that all the measurements you presented are your own, i.e, that you are not presenting measurements performed by Acon without disclosing the latter.
You
wrote"I used Plus III as rough demo, actrualy no measuement for it provided for me. so I refined it to other, "
(emphasis is mine).
That makes me wonder whether the other measurements have been provided to you. Such measurements require an oscilloscope, a relatively expensive piece of equipment that regular photography enthusiast don't just happen to have sitting on their desks. I asked you before what else you are doing with your oscilloscope, but as usual, you ignored an apparently inconvenient question.