Originally posted by sibyrnes I have been using my K1 for slide copying and I feel pretty good about the results. I have been using a Vivitar 283 for the light source. I have been receiving suggestions that I should be using a "softer" light source. My understanding is that the "softness" of a light source is directly related to the size of the source. I am photographing 35mm slides so the light source from my flash is already larger than the subject. Will I get better results from a larger light source or is this just a solution looking for a problem?
Here are some examples of the results I am getting. What do you think?
Canyonlands | Flickr Your results look super good to me. I've done a lot of film "scanning" with my K3. At some point I was futzing with my light source and have started to get vignetting from my source, driving me crazy as I haven't been able to get back to my good state (I'll get there). :P
I'd say if you're happy with the results (and you should be!) you're good! :-)
Care to post up a photo of your scanning set up? Mine looks like this, ish. My light source is a 100 watt incandescent bulb, diffused with a few layers of diffusing material, inside a small plywood box. When I have more space I'm going to make a longer box so the bulb is farther from the diffusing panel.