Originally posted by mcgregni You're welcome! I'm pleased you found it interesting. The remote flash head zoom of course should work, but its all quite a big ask to expect full compatibility between electronic devices made by three totally independent companies, and without any specific co-operation between them. As we've been seeing on an adjacent thread here, we cannot expect everything to be seamless when there are variables between third party flashes and the way they implement the P-TTL / TTL protocol.
I agree it is a big ask to get full compatibility. TBH was hoping rather than expecting
Quote: There have been recent reports of the Yongnuo P-TTL model not remote zooming either, as well as with some Metz models, and also reports that the camera format seems to have an effect on this (eg needing to set the 'crop' mode on the K1 to get zooming going). Perhaps this is relevant to your 645 also? The Pentax flashes are designed to accommodate correct display of zoom positions for all formats (35mm, aps-c and 645), whereas the third party models probably are not. However there was a firmware update for the Yongnuo P-TTL model that I think fixed this? It might be over-optimistic however to expect the same result for a Nikon version though. But worth updating the flash if its possible.
Yes I have not been able to get zooming going on the 568EX's. I did notice that to get the flash power to operate and match on the cactus on camera (TX) with the one attached to flash (RX) you need to alter the thumbwheel to trigger the units to 'talk' to each other. Once this done then communication works normally. I cannot think of anything to help the zoom function work and maybe it will not with the Yongnuo or even with the Nikon SB600 (yet to give this a try)
Unfortunately the 568's firmware cannot be updated
Originally posted by Class A Do you want to use the flash on-camera, with the Cactus V6IIsandwiched between camera and flash?
In that case, have you configured the camera system to be "PENTAX" (or left it on auto-detect) and configured the flash system to "NIKON"? You may also want to manually choose the flash model you are mounting on the V6II. I'm unsure whether this may support HSS. It may very well not work, but I guess it is worth a try.
Thanks for you input on this. Yes, the thought was to sandwich the V6 II between camera and flash, mainly to add a convenietnt and simple fill and catchlight facility with the option of HSS. Some concerns about the unwieldy nature of this and if it would put too much strain on the camera particularly in portrait orientation.
The camera system has been configured to be Pentax and the flash to Nikon (also somewhere in the menu the Yongnuo 568EX is available (flash profile I think))
Quote: There are two different kinds of firmware for the V6II.
The "multi-brand" variant supports cross-brand power control and HSS.
Only the other "X-TTL" variant supports cross-brand TTL support. Unfortunately, however, the Pentax version of the X-TTL firmware variant does not support cross-brand TTL. It only provides P-TTL support via radio with devices that are P-TTL capable. So unfortunately, you are out of luck with your Nikon-dedicated equipment.
Not the end of the world that one system not fully compatible with another and TBH not really expected - just hope against experience
. So it seems if I want this kind of TTL support I must opt for either a Pentax manufactured flash or a third party Pentax compatible, Metz etc. The other option that has taken seed is to go for the Cactus RF60x
Originally posted by Class A If you want to use HSS then the V6II will always use a pre-flash.
Sadly, even if you only want to use remote power control then the V6II will also use a pre-flash. There won't be a pre-flash with the RF60x but any flash fired by a V6II receiver will produce a pre-flash when you are able to remote control its power.
The only way to avoid the pre-flash with a V6II is to forgo remote power control and set profiles to "MANUAL".
The V6 supports remote power control without implying a pre-flash by using analogue TTL rather than digital TTL power control.
This may turn out to be a dumb question but if V6 set to manual would HSS work without the preflash?
The more I think about this the more interested I become in the RF60x as it would seem to be effectively adding a third V6 type controller as well as P TTL flash allowing use of other flash units albeit with certain caveats.