AF-360FGZ wireless mode provides master, control, and slave operation, all with indication of P-TTL.
AF-360FGZII wireless mode provides master and control with indication of P-TTL, but with wireless slave as a separate mode not indicating P-TTL at all, but rather with manual power increments 1/1, 1/2, 1/4, . . . 1/256.
Why the different implementations?
I take it that if I want P-TTL operation with one flash offboard, then the offboard flash MUST be the original 360 set as P-TTL slave, with the 360II on the camera (or corded to it) as either master or control. The other way around, I will need to set the power ratio manually on the slaved 360II, trusting the original 360 to operate P-TTL as it triggers the 360II.
Does any of this sound incorrect? The original 360 is on the right here. The 1/1 thereon is the flashgun-to-flashgun output ratio, with 2/3, 1/2, and 1/3 following. The 1/1 on the 36FGZII is the first power increment for it alone, with 1/2, 1/4, 1/8 . . . 1/256 following.
The second picture is a shot with the setup as I described, with the 360FGZII as master on camera with ceiling bounce, and the original 360 in slaved P-TTL in an umbrella to my left. I'm just puzzled why I would need to do things completely differently (set manual dump on 360II) had I put the 360FGZII offboard in wireless manual (not P-TTL) slave.
Thanks.