Originally posted by photoptimist The average hobby photographer never "needs" any flash (let alone 1200 W·s flash ) at all. The high ISO performance of modern cameras is so good that ambient light suffices for almost all shots.
Flash photography is not about increasing light levels.
It is about controlling the light. Natural light can be really useful but it can also be unusable because it comes from the wrong direction, does not have the desired quality (softness), etc.
Originally posted by rml63 And I guess my next question is having never used a strobe how many times would the average hobby photographer need 1200ws of power?
I'd say almost never. That kind of power is only needed when you want to compete with bright sunlight, using a large modifier, and requiring larger then normal distances between light modifier and subject, while using HSS.
Originally posted by rml63 How did you guys come to a final decision on portability vs power ?
The AD200 is very hard to beat in terms of versatility and applicability.
I used it to counterbalance sunlight during golden hour with a modifier without running out of power. In harsher conditions, more power can be useful. The new AD300 PRO only offers a modest increase and is hence only of interest to those who want to use the proprietary Godox mount modifiers which are somewhat more compact than Bowens mount light modifiers.
The AD400 PRO is rather popular as it provides a full stop more compared to the AD200 PRO, has a higher battery capacity (~780 AD200-equivalent flashes compared to ~500 for the AD 200 PRO), and supports both the Godox-mount and the Bowens mount (via a fixed adapter) without requiring an S-bracket (like the AD200 PRO does).
The AD600 PRO has even more power, even more battery capacity, a stronger modelling light, but is also a bit bigger and heavier than the AD400 PRO.
I chose both AD200 (for ultimate mobility and supporting lights) and AD600 PRO (for uncompromised performance). The models in between are compromises that did not appeal to me but I can completely see that specific usages can make any of the intermediate models more attractive.