For clarity, btw, the 283 and 285 used to be pretty interchangeable, but 283's are known to carry a high trigger voltage indeed. than the '285HV' (If I say '285' that's what I mean.) These can vary and need to be tested to be safe.
The difference is that the 'hv' model, of which far more were made than the plain old 285, has isolated the circuit from any gel or Quantum pack you might plug it into, thus protecting photographers. That it happens to usually be safe for cameras is actually a bit incidental. So test.
Wonderful things, though, ...back in the day many working photogs would buy those. They passed the 'drop test.' (If you drop it on the floor, are you losing money on the gig?') This was especially because some department stores would advertise them in newspapers at cut-rate prices, based on their power, and then they would try and sell fancier units to the hobbyists. Kind of a benign bait and switch, cause they'd sell out quickly and cheerfully raincheck you.
I've still got one, a last survivor of c 1987. Think I paid thirty bucks.
Retail.
(Need to check the trigger voltage, still, though, for digital use)
The detached sensor cords rock. And are hard to find for the 285, since they didn't re-issue them when they started producing 285's again. Somewhat more are available for the 283, (actually have one, myself) since more were made. As I recall, the general attitude toward 285s was 'Nice, but bulkier and has features you don't really need.' (Zoom heads hadn't really caught on, for one, and they're also more of a pain to stick a bounce-card on.
)
Now I feel old.
I could be like a 'Photoethnographer,' as someone terms it.
285's can do darn near anything, you can do studio, you can do events, with a little figuring, you can do macro... you can blow the retinas out of over-aggressive locals... A photo-gal's best friend, really.
The detached sensor cord is something they really should re-issue though. Hard to find, but insanely useful.