Win a Pentax Limited Lens: Raffle Now Live!

It'sMyFault · 03-02-2012, 03:34 AM

Hi, we are not getting many satisfactory photos using this lens in Auto or Scene modes.
Is there any configuration or setup that needed to be done when fitting this lens (as far as I know it just uses the cameras AF & IS).

Alternatively, maybe start using it in Av mode and stopped down?
(MrsIMF has done a two day DSLR course but finds full Manual mode a bit too complex at this stage).

Parallax · 03-02-2012, 08:47 AM

Without knowing what is "unsatisfactory" about them, it's impossible to answer your question.

Adam · 03-02-2012, 10:41 AM

You should definitely post some sample photos with the EXIF intact! One possibility could be that you're not shooting at fast enough shutter speeds, meaning you'd have to crank up the ISO. But there are dozens of other possible explanations, as Parallax said

ItsMyFault · 03-02-2012, 07:54 PM

Thanks for responding. I may not be able to post photos as a Visitor?

Parallax · 03-02-2012, 07:56 PM

You're welcome to join us.

jimr-pdx · 03-02-2012, 08:52 PM

I kept my 18-200 Sigma at f/8 and fired away on k-x and k-r; I was very happy with the results, which seldom needed any more than some sharpening.

This one is 63mm f/5.6

03-02-2012, 03:34 AM	#1
It'sMyFault Guest	k-r + Sigma 18-200 Hi, we are not getting many satisfactory photos using this lens in Auto or Scene modes. Is there any configuration or setup that needed to be done when fitting this lens (as far as I know it just uses the cameras AF & IS). Alternatively, maybe start using it in Av mode and stopped down? (MrsIMF has done a two day DSLR course but finds full Manual mode a bit too complex at this stage).

03-02-2012, 10:41 AM	#3
Adam Administrator Site Webmaster Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Arizona Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 51,608	You should definitely post some sample photos with the EXIF intact! One possibility could be that you're not shooting at fast enough shutter speeds, meaning you'd have to crank up the ISO. But there are dozens of other possible explanations, as Parallax said Adam PentaxForums.com Webmaster (Site Usage Guide \| Site Help \| My Photography) PentaxForums.com server and development costs are user-supported. You can help cover these costs by donating or purchasing one of our Pentax eBooks. Or, buy your photo gear from our affiliates, Adorama, B&H Photo, KEH, or Topaz Labs, and get FREE Marketplace access - click here to see how! Trusted Pentax retailers:

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
For Sale - Sold: Nikon 200/4 D micro, 80-200/2.8 AF-S, 85/1.4 D, Sigma 100-300/4 DG EX	dgaies	Sold Items	6	12-01-2011 06:42 AM
Sigma 18-250 vs Tamron 18-200 vs Sigma 18-200	5150ds	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	19	04-11-2011 05:00 PM
Old sigma 70-200 vs New hsm 70-200	41ants	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	3	07-14-2010 06:38 AM

03-02-2012, 08:47 AM	#2
Parallax Senior Moderator Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: South Dakota Photos: Gallery Posts: 19,333	Without knowing what is "unsatisfactory" about them, it's impossible to answer your question.

03-02-2012, 07:54 PM	#4
ItsMyFault Guest	Thanks for responding. I may not be able to post photos as a Visitor?

03-02-2012, 07:56 PM	#5
Parallax Senior Moderator Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: South Dakota Photos: Gallery Posts: 19,333	You're welcome to join us.

03-02-2012, 08:52 PM	#6
jimr-pdx Pentaxian Join Date: May 2010 Location: now 1 hour north of PDX Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 3,897	I kept my 18-200 Sigma at f/8 and fired away on k-x and k-r; I was very happy with the results, which seldom needed any more than some sharpening. This one is 63mm f/5.6

k-r + Sigma 18-200

Win a Pentax Limited Lens: Raffle Now Live!