Originally posted by grainbelt Certainly #2 and #6 capture fantastic facial expressions.
#3 and #5 are some what odd moments in time but I didn't respond to them as much.
Regarding the exposure and the b&w conversions, the high-contrast look that is so often associated with 'street' photography has blown some highlights, particularly in #6 where we have this blob of hair and shirt behind the woman. Hard to say without seeing the original, but retaining some detail there may have been useful.
Either way I had to revisit the series twice and pick at nits to come up with anything resembling constructive input. Very well done!
Oh yeah I was a little upset about that one - I had to rush over to grab the shot and was really not prepared anyways, and my expoosure comp threw off the hair highlights. And then there it goes...
Originally posted by climit Not bad. You like harsh contrast. Nothing special about it. The expresions are indifferent.
I turned up the contrast for the street photography because it gives more of an intensity, or that "gritty" feel that seems fitting for these images [I feel].
Originally posted by Sparkle The idea here is to compare/contrast with the street photography of Vivian Maier, not whether one likes street photography, B & W or not. It requires an assessment of the two.
Thanks again for the compliments Sparkle!