Originally posted by Aristophanes There's irony here aplenty!
The bane of the Auto 110 IIRC was not SLR snubs, but the evolution of advanced 35mm P&S's with terrific lenses, such as the Olympus XA series. The latter used superior film and people accepted the tradeoffs of the limited lens reach.
I never said that SLR snobbery killed the Auto 110 -- it most definitely was the advancements in 35mm film handling in the P&S cameras (automatic loading, advance, rewind, etc.). That killed the 110 and 126 film cartridge for convenience, and subsequently most camera models using cartridge film quickly fizzled.
My comment about SLR snobbery was just that -- people mocking or scoffing at my Auto 110 system when the funny part was that I was getting the same shots they were -- better shots in some situations because the only zoom or wideangle they could afford was their feet.
A lot of the same is happening with the Q. The camera isn't even released yet, and it's already being mocked by people who mention wanting full frame in the same message...?
I can guarantee you one way the Q will be a failure -- if all the Pentax owners on the various forums keep bashing it. Most people do not come to these forums except for research when shopping for a camera. What do you think people researching the Q are going to find? Thread after thread bashing it as a toy. Who do you think is going to buy it with all this ridiculous negative feedback from Pentax owners? What a great way to stand behind your brand of choice, people!