Originally posted by bacondesign Really nice pictures. I'm surprised the 110 lenses are actually good (well at least the 50mm). Do you have any k-mount 50mm lenses and an adapter for the Q? I'd like to see some side by side comparisons. I have a 110 with the lenses but I don't have an adapter.
Thanks.
These lenses are pretty good, quite sharp and with nice color rendering. Of course their flare control is well below modern standards and they don't cover an APS-C frame entirely, but I used them with my NEX camera to some (I believe) good results. You can find some full resolution samples here:
Index of /nexforum
Of course the vignette is quite strong and the corners are really soft but I must admit I like the results ;-)
Suprisingly, they seem sharper on the NEX camera but I think it's a result of my lack of experience in using the Q with manual lenses and because of the sensor scannig time (1/13th of a second) in the Q. Whenever I manage to hold the camera steadily i get quite sharp pictures from the 110 lenses. The other thing is the FOV one gets with the Q - it's very narrow, so a much shorter exposure time is needed.
Unfortunately I do not own a K-mount 50 mm lens right now but I used to have a copy of SMC Pentax-M 50 mm f/1.7 and it was sharper at f/2.8 than a 50 mm 110 lens. But than again it's not only about sharpness, right? :-) Of course, these lenses cannot replace a regular "50", even only for a lack of diaphragm reason, but they are fun to use with all the mirrorless cameras I have :-)