Originally posted by AKum8 Hello Pinholecam, your shots are very impressive and look you're getting the best from the Q. I'm wondering if you have ever compared the Q with premium compact cameras.
I did a quick technical IQ comparison between the Q, Sony HX9V travel zoom and Sony RX100, see my post on this forum
Pinholecam, thanks for the nice little write up. I am not a macro or tele guy, but I wasn't a fisheye guy until I tried the Q with its brilliant little fish lens... So your posts leave me intrigued. The incredible flexibility of the Q is really its biggest benefit over other premium small compacts. IQ is "good enough"* and the size is really a boon to taking it everywhere with you--which results in the ability to challenge and grow your photography on a daily basis. Love that.
If the Q had a native, AF + ND, fast wide prime and short tele, I would be so thrilled. I'd also buy a short tele zoom--would be really fun for the occasional sports shooting I do. If Pentax can build out the lens library, this will be a really neat system. Even as-is, you show the strengths and possibilities well.
One question: you seem to get good results from the "reversal film" color setting. This is one area I've found very weak with the Q (color). I've only used the reversal film setting a little, and some shots were brilliant, others showed a weird shift in skin tones. Have you noted that, or has the reversal film setting really been a great all-rounder?
* "Good Enough" isn't a slam; remember, the Leica was originally designed to be "good enough" in a land of large format cameras.