Originally posted by pinholecam To me, more megapix on the Q is pointless.
The pixel peeping will never get satisfaction from small sensors for this type of thing.
At 12mp with its small sensor, some legacy lenses used with the adapter is already showing evident CA, 16mp will be worse.
It will show up focus and subject/camera movement easily at 100%
There are quite a few things I'd rather they improve :
1. AF speed to be on par with the 2011-2012 m4/3 cameras (ie. very competent)
2. flash sync speed with adapted lenses
I agree with all of the above.
The people who are most vocal about the negatives of the Q sensor are those who don't own one and are extrapolating their IQ "common knowledge" from their experience with DSLR format class sensors which are essentially generations behind in technological development. The CA evident in images from the Q lenses because of the ultra high pixel density would be essentially not worth worrying about on much larger sensors -- but would be exacerbated by a higher pixel density sensor.
Phase Detect focusing sensors on the imaging sensor (ala Nikon 1) could boost focusing speed considerably.
Either the internal shutter K to Q adapter or a sensor with digital shutter circuitry that allowed flash sync up to 1/250 with external flash and sync up to max shutter speed with the pop up flash might be possible. Internal shutter adapters for other lens mounts would attract ultra tele and macro shooters from other platforms. Fully manual and Auto Thyristor flashes also need to be supported for use with adapted lenses, and wireless P-TTL capability with the pop up flash as a Master or Controller would be nice..
In addition, I'd like a higher res much more glare resistant LCD with a faster refresh rate. Add Focus Peaking or a better implementation (capable of holding the magnification until shutter is tripped) of focus assist magnification (with higher magnification enhanced with the higher res screen) and the Q would be awesome with adapted lenses for my use.
On a lower priority, AF during video would probably encourage me to shoot more video, but it's not a priority for me. . .
If brought to the leading edge of existing tech, and with a full system of lenses, the Q would be a camera system to be reckoned with IMO. -- Actually, it already is, but there's room for improvement on a lot of fronts.
I'm for anything that would further promote the Q concept. I'm on record as always thinking of it as brilliant.
Scott