Originally posted by DDoram The 06 is my favorite Q zoom lens and is great throughout the range. Great zoom range in a small package.
Dale
Originally posted by howieb101 I have only has the lens for a few days but my thinking is that the optical quality and what such lens allows you to do significantly outweighs issues with build quality.
To be able to:
- control depth of field (on such a small format sensor),
- get faster shutter speeds, and
- at a low weight,
are all worthy and great aspects of the lens. The build quality is on par with the 5-15mm so its not exactly a let down if you already have that lens. It is what it is. Its not that I would mind better build quality mind you.
Howie B
I'll add my 2¢ here in support of the 06 lens.
In any other system, a
constant f2.8 short to long tele zoom (think ~70 to ~200 EQ) is at least a $700 USD proposition, even from 3rd party lensmakers. From an OEM, under $1200 USD would be unthinkable. I was pleasantly
shocked to see Pentax introduce this lens at under $300 USD, and didn't even have to think about pre-ordering it at full price, even though I rarely pre-order anything. This lens retails for the same price as the "kit" zoom and doesn't disappoint from an optical performance standpoint. There had to be some compromise to reach this price point. Let's face a real fact -- Pentaxians tend to be frugal (I'm being kind to use this term), and in my estimation, would not have reacted well to a lens of this optical spec, built like a tank, priced a few hundred dollars higher.
Functionally, this "slop" is limited to the collapsing mechanism that allows compact storage since the lens features both internal zoom and focusing (which are, BTW, more expensive to design and mfg). This should have little or no effect on the long term reliability of the lens. I think that plastic is probably the best choice for Q system lenses that need to be very lightweight. The alternative is very thin aluminum, and thin aluminum would be much more vulnerable to distortion from even slight knocks. Of course they could have used magnesium or titanium to reach their lightweight design goal, but I can't even imagine what that would have done to the price. . .
It's fine to be fussy about build quality, but IMO, the Pentax designers made the right choices with the 06. The "slop" is easily and economically fixable on a DIY basis (the shimming solution provided by Riv is brilliant). I suggest we count our blessings on this one. . .
Scott