They should just look at a 'real world review'
Can never trust a straight tie camera review website to show off what the camera can do.
All I can say, I have the camera and have used it probably more and more intensively that the reviewer.
All real world, real life situations.
To me, the Q7 with the bigger sensor is 'There'
Something that one has no qualms about bringing out as a camera that will carry the day thru.
01, 06 and FE are great (and perhaps so the 02, but I'm not chummy with it yet), limited no. of lenses comment in the summary is toss.. (Its good enough for now IF the user has the vision)
Don't forget that lenses carry over to the next system, so in the long run, its cheaper than any 'like' pns.
They still can't detach their thinking that ILC means that it needs a big sensor.... sad...
Q7+FE something no other compact camera has unless attaching a 3rd party FE adapter which is big and gives bad IQ.
A last minute trip to this spot yesterday cause some visiting relatives wanted to view the place.
Did not want to be burdened by gear and I knew the sky wasn't the best (gloomy), so just grabbed the Q7 and a full set (FE,01;06) all in a waist pouch.
All said though, pretty even review that's quite expected from DPR ( also lacks that 'oomph' in enthusiasm and vision to use a camera thats typical from them
)
Last edited by pinholecam; 08-09-2013 at 05:06 PM.