The Q series of cameras are strange beasts. On the one hand they have very advanced controls and functions like HDR stacking, Av and M shooting modes, built in ND filter, leaf shutters, and RAW output. However, they lack what some would expected from such an advanced camera. There is no EVF, built in WiFi, tilting screen, etc. The sensor is small and there are only eight native lenses. I think it's a potent mix of pros and cons that drives the photographer toward a new path of creativity - one that they would not have taken with a DSLR or an advanced u4/3 system. The photographer is forced to work around the technical shortcoming and while some shots may be missed there will other shots taken which would never have come otherwise. When technology does all the work for someone they don't strive as hard as a whole. I don't mean to say that the Q is hard to use but the missing features are those that many snap shooters take for granted nowadays.
I would not say that the Q is for everyone, especially for those who don't own one and criticize it.
No, not you ... but threads on other forums abound where posters bash the little Q like a fuzzed out tennis ball. If you're the creative type who likes to play and do things you're not suppose to then the Q is for you.
If you do get a Q then play around with it as-is. Don't go crazy buying extra lenses or adapters. The 02 lens is surprisingly good. Just be sure to shoot at its sharpest, which is wide open. Shoot RAW. Nudge the sharpness, contrast, vibrancy, and saturation sliders together just a bit. The image will bloom before your eyes. You can probably set all of this in the camera and get a nice 8-bit per color channel JPG. I prefer saving all the data, 12-bits per color channel. Decimate it later.