Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
01-14-2016, 06:00 AM   #1
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tokyo
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,235
Lens patent: 4.2mm (20mm equiv.)

I haven't seen and Q-centric patents registered for a while, or much talk of the Q at all. Here is one that appeared this week for a f1.7 wide-angle prime for a 1/1.7" sensor.

Ricoh 4.2mm F1.8(1/1.7")?????????????So-net???

The writer points out that a similar patent already exists for a 4.4mm f1.4, but this one seems a bit simpler. It strikes me that it would be a very good lens to have if it were put into production.

01-14-2016, 09:24 AM   #2
Pentaxian
CarlJF's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Quebec City
Posts: 730
Many Q users dream of having this kind of small, affordable, fixed lens wide angle solution for the Q line. At least, I'm one of them and would gladly buy 4.2mm 1.8 lens for my Q, as long as the price isn't insanely high.
01-14-2016, 10:06 AM   #3
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NJ
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 4,879
I'm not so sure this patent means anything substantive for the Q system - where's our macro lens, where's the superzoom, there are patents for those - I guess it does give us a glimmer of hope that there may be a Q-vival.
01-14-2016, 02:38 PM   #4
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Manila
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,190
New Ricoh patent for a Pentax Q 4.2mm f/1.8 lens | Pentax Rumors

Yup it seems to be true. Glad Ricoh hasn't given up on the tiny, fun system. This would be the next "serious" prime after the 01, right? Anyway, even if the lens doesn't come out soon (though I hope it will, along with earlier patents), I hope Pentax makes an announcement for them to show their commitment to keeping the Q alive.

01-14-2016, 04:09 PM   #5
Loyal Site Supporter
pacerr's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Henry, TN
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,892
To support a commitment to new Q lenses there must also be a parallel commitment to new Q bodies incorporating advances that keep them marketable.

As the current bodies age there'd be no market for lens for outdated technology.

If you see a new body there may or may not be new lenses forthcoming, but if there are new lenses there must also be new bodies to support the future market profitability.
01-14-2016, 05:40 PM   #6
Veteran Member




Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: California
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,354
QuoteOriginally posted by JPT Quote
I haven't seen and Q-centric patents registered for a while, or much talk of the Q at all. Here is one that appeared this week for a f1.7 wide-angle prime for a 1/1.7" sensor.

Ricoh 4.2mm F1.8(1/1.7")?????????????So-net???

The writer points out that a similar patent already exists for a 4.4mm f1.4, but this one seems a bit simpler. It strikes me that it would be a very good lens to have if it were put into production.
I desperately want a wide prime for my Q. I'm curious as to how hard it would have been to make these lenses fast, like 1.0 or 0.95.
01-14-2016, 05:47 PM   #7
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Manila
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,190
I think it's not really hard to make fast lenses for the Q - the problem is how to maintain them being small...
01-14-2016, 05:47 PM   #8
Site Supporter




Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: South Bend, IN, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,966
QuoteOriginally posted by fuent104 Quote
I desperately want a wide prime for my Q. I'm curious as to how hard it would have been to make these lenses fast, like 1.0 or 0.95.
I would be satisfied with f/1.9 even, if that allows them to keep the price in the 01's neighborhood

01-18-2016, 03:11 PM   #9
Veteran Member




Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: California
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,354
QuoteOriginally posted by Alizarine Quote
I think it's not really hard to make fast lenses for the Q - the problem is how to maintain them being small...
I don't know. The lens elements for the 01 lens are tiny, especially compared to the size of the mount. even if the front and rear elements were double the size they are now, they would still be small.
01-20-2016, 12:56 PM   #10
Senior Member
Ontarian50's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 243
Wow. That thing has 11 elements in it!
01-31-2016, 04:11 AM   #11
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Manila
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,190
QuoteOriginally posted by fuent104 Quote
I don't know. The lens elements for the 01 lens are tiny, especially compared to the size of the mount. even if the front and rear elements were double the size they are now, they would still be small.
For us yes it will still be small - but most likely the Pentax engineering and design teams have some sort of standard or limits to the size they can make. Otherwise I guess we should have those f1 lenses by now, given their skill
01-31-2016, 04:27 AM   #12
Site Supporter
Sandy Hancock's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Adelaide Hills, South Australia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 5,635
Pancake form and a 49mm filter (like the 08 zoom) would be better than longer and thinner in my opinion, but a fast wide prime would be most welcome in any guise.
01-31-2016, 04:42 AM   #13
Pentaxian
raider's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,931
so this would be almost like an DA14 on K-3 kind of field of view yes? unless I got my math wrong...

Looks good....if the price is reasonable AND if Pentax still decides to keep the Q going...

The thought of Pentax killing the Q did cross my mind sometimes.....
01-31-2016, 04:49 AM   #14
Site Supporter
Sandy Hancock's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Adelaide Hills, South Australia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 5,635
QuoteOriginally posted by raider Quote
So this would be almost like an DA14 on K-3 kind of field of view yes? unless I got my math wrong...
Wider than that. More like 12.6mm judging by the diagonals of the respective sensors - about 18.9mm in FF terms.
In other words, bloody wide.
01-31-2016, 04:54 AM   #15
Pentaxian
raider's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,931
QuoteOriginally posted by Sandy Hancock Quote
Wider than that. More like 12.6mm judging by the diagonals of the respective sensors - about 18.9mm in FF terms.
In other words, bloody wide.
Ok. That is indeed wide! Prolly won't be cheap!!
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, lens, lenses, mirrorless, patent, pentax q, pentax q10, pentax q7, q-s1, q10, q7
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale - Sold: Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC Lens saxt001 Sold Items 6 02-26-2015 01:37 PM
ricoh files patent on 2 Q lens designs and on 4/3 design! shaolen Pentax News and Rumors 20 08-21-2014 12:03 AM
Patent: 4.4mm f1.4 JPT Pentax Q 8 08-01-2014 04:50 PM
Tamron patent for a 15-50mm f/1.4 lens? Phil A Pentax Q 2 04-17-2014 08:07 PM
Ricoh patent: 28mm equiv. lenses - Future of GRD and GXR? JPT Pentax News and Rumors 2 07-07-2012 08:04 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:02 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top