Originally posted by Fogel70 Q lenses may show more uniform performance as the optics don't have the same resolution as larger optics.
Say what? Their lp/mm resolution is way above the resolution of most larger optics.
That's noticeable when you put K-mount lenses on the adapter.
The 06 at 40mm clearly outperforms my DA40XS, for example.
(Although the 06 is actually longer than the DA40XS, if not as wide.)
Originally posted by Fogel70 Comparing data on Photozone.de the Q 01 prime on 12MP camera give slightly better performance at f/2.8 than DA 55-300 tested on 10MP at 300mm wide open. But the DA 55-300 would perform better with a 12MP sensor without AA filter. I would expect the Q 06 to perform similar to 01 if it's a very good lens.
Photozone tested the 01-03 on the original Q.
On the 1/1.7" sensor, the lenses will show more lp/ih.
In real use, the Q system often outperforms APS-C systems for sharpness,
where the PDAF may not be accurate enough.
It's the difference between lab tests and actual practice.
Of course, other aspects of IQ like DR are a different story.
---------- Post added 09-29-16 at 08:44 PM ----------
Originally posted by monochrome Who actually develops Q RAW's in LR?
The people who don't use Photoshop?