Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version 8 Likes Search this Thread
04-07-2018, 03:37 AM - 1 Like   #1
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 391
Shutter release cable for Q?

Thinking of DIY ideas for improving the Q’s infrared remote functionality. I found pointing my current IR remote at the Q from a couple of feet away to be a little hit or miss when aiming at the rear sensor window. I mostly would shoot from behind. Want something more reliable. Intend to base it off a different 3rd party IR remote with dedicated focus and shutter release buttons (my current one was a freebie single button remote). Maybe use a timer remote I have for DSLR for added time lapse flexibility as I find the Q’s integrated remote app a little tricky to interrupt when using short intervals such as 1-3 seconds.

1. Use audio optic fiber (with toslink connections perhaps) channeling the IR signal from the remote LED to the sensor on the camera body. Not sure how to get one end of the optical cable to line up with the IR sensor on the Q body though. Maybe mold something with Sugru like silicone putty.

2. Solder wires to extend the IR emitting LED off from the remote’s housing. The LED would need to be positioned near the IR sensor on the camera body somehow.

Just thinking aloud. Has anyone else tried this and can add feedback before I start working on it.

Cheers.


Last edited by 2old4toys; 04-07-2018 at 05:48 AM.
04-07-2018, 06:17 AM   #2
Veteran Member
CarlJF's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Quebec City
Posts: 1,185
I may be wrong. But I thought the Q only had a IR sensor in the front...
04-07-2018, 06:52 AM   #3
Unregistered User
Guest




QuoteOriginally posted by CarlJF Quote
I may be wrong. But I thought the Q only had a IR sensor in the front...
It's right above the +/- button.
04-07-2018, 07:10 AM   #4
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: midwest, United States
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 5,717
Great idea 2old4toys. There might be an easier way. One of my Olympus has a wired remote that works thru the usb connector. I have read that the Q can actually tether with the proper program. So couldn't a wired usb remote be built? Sure would be nice!
Thanks,
barondla

04-07-2018, 07:40 AM   #5
Veteran Member
Ontarian50's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 530
QuoteOriginally posted by CarlJF Quote
I may be wrong. But I thought the Q only had a IR sensor in the front...
Yes, the Q designers had the amazing sense to put an IR receiver on the back as well as the front. However, for some odd reason, the rear one is given much less sensitivity - you have to be right up close for it to work reliably.

Why can't my K-01 have an IR sensor on the back - or any of the other SLRs for that matter?
04-07-2018, 07:50 AM   #6
Veteran Member
CarlJF's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Quebec City
Posts: 1,185
QuoteOriginally posted by Cipher Quote
It's right above the +/- button.
That's good to know! I nerver noticed it before. The windows is much smaller than the front one. Which may explain, at least in part, why it's less sensitive than the front one. But at least, it's there!
04-07-2018, 08:16 AM   #7
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: midwest, United States
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 5,717
QuoteOriginally posted by Ontarian50 Quote
Yes, the Q designers had the amazing sense to put an IR receiver on the back as well as the front. However, for some odd reason, the rear one is given much less sensitivity - you have to be right up close for it to work reliably.

Why can't my K-01 have an IR sensor on the back - or any of the other SLRs for that matter?
The Pentax K 7 DSLR has a remote sensor on the back.
Thanks,
barondla

04-07-2018, 08:42 AM   #8
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
pacerr's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Paris, TN
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,350
QuoteOriginally posted by 2old4toys Quote
1. Use audio optic fiber (with toslink connections perhaps) channeling the IR signal from the remote LED to the sensor on the camera body. Not sure how to get one end of the optical cable to line up with the IR sensor on the Q body though. Maybe mold something with Sugru like silicone putty.
Ive successfully used the optical fiber trick on a few cameras. Kind'a fiddly to get it right though but a flexible solution. A bent metal bracket fitting the flash shoe was used to position the fiber 'wire' in front of the IR receptor with the Q's. Could be done with bent copper wire originaling at the tripod fitting too.
04-07-2018, 08:53 AM   #9
Moderator
Not a Number's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 10,526
QuoteOriginally posted by Ontarian50 Quote
Why can't my K-01 have an IR sensor on the back - or any of the other SLRs for that matter?
If I'm not mistaken all the high-end Pentax DSLRs (e.g. K10D, K20D, K-7, K-5/ii/iis, K-3/ii, K-1/ii) have front and back remote sensors

QuoteOriginally posted by pacerr Quote
Ive successfully used the optical fiber trick on a few cameras. Kind'a fiddly to get it right though but a flexible solution. A bent metal bracket fitting the flash shoe was used to position the fiber 'wire' in front of the IR receptor with the Q's. Could be done with bent copper wire originaling at the tripod fitting too.
As I recall a few people have used a low tech solution of merely positioning a piece of white card before the front sensor and pointing the remote at the card from behind the camera.
04-07-2018, 04:43 PM   #10
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 391
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by pacerr Quote
Ive successfully used the optical fiber trick on a few cameras. Kind'a fiddly to get it right though but a flexible solution. A bent metal bracket fitting the flash shoe was used to position the fiber 'wire' in front of the IR receptor with the Q's. Could be done with bent copper wire originaling at the tripod fitting too.
Great! An easily removable solution would be ideal. Wanting to keep the tripod mount free so doing something with the hotshoe is an open option.

04-07-2018, 09:08 PM - 1 Like   #11
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 391
Original Poster
Nearly there as a proof of concept. Admittedly could be more elegant. Already like that I don’t need to raise my arm and consciously take sniper aim at the sensor each time to take a shot. Much more intuitive to me with just to click a physical button on the end of a wire. The membrane button on the 3rd party IR remote itself does not provide a good feel when engaged. A separate mechanical 2 stage shutter button on the end of a wire is certainly an improvement that instills greater confidence that good contact is made. Looking to refine the below with something more lightweight.
Attached Images
 

Last edited by 2old4toys; 04-07-2018 at 09:27 PM.
04-07-2018, 09:18 PM - 1 Like   #12
Pentaxian




Join Date: May 2016
Photos: Albums
Posts: 2,003
QuoteOriginally posted by Not a Number Quote
If I'm not mistaken all the high-end Pentax DSLRs (e.g. K10D, K20D, K-7, K-5/ii/iis, K-3/ii, K-1/ii) have front and back remote sensors
The rear sensor is a red filter; on the K-3 & K-1 it is just above the 4-way controller pad.
04-08-2018, 02:25 PM - 1 Like   #13
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 391
Original Poster
Found a useful related article for wiring up a programmable remote for use with IR only cameras.

Some functionality works a little differently vs on a camera with a native wired remote support. Most importantly for IR remotes is that for bulb mode, we use 2 taps of the shutter button are needed, the 1st to start bulb mode and a 2nd to stop it.

creating a programmable remote shutter release for Pentax Kx | Sussex Photo

Last edited by 2old4toys; 04-08-2018 at 02:35 PM.
04-13-2018, 11:34 PM   #14
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 391
Original Poster
Found a little plastic capsule-toy working mini anglepose white LED lamp. May wire it to a hotshoe for this project and replace the LED with an IR one so it can be shone at the front sensor.
Attached Images
 
04-18-2018, 07:18 AM - 2 Likes   #15
Senior Member
kayakfari's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: South Florida
Posts: 173
QuoteOriginally posted by Ontarian50 Quote
Yes, the Q designers had the amazing sense to put an IR receiver on the back as well as the front. However, for some odd reason, the rear one is given much less sensitivity - you have to be right up close for it to work reliably.

Why can't my K-01 have an IR sensor on the back - or any of the other SLRs for that matter?
FYI .. I've taken my Q completely apart and there is only one sensor, in the front. What they did is run a short length of a clear plastic tube to the back so it can also pick up the IR signal.
In practice, only the front reliably fires the cam but still sometimes requires some "wrist action".
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
body, cable, camera, mirrorless, pentax q, pentax q10, pentax q7, q-s1, q10, q7, sensor, shutter

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Please recommend a shutter cable release for the K-70 DMITRY1 Pentax K-70 & KF 5 04-08-2018 01:04 AM
shutter release cable? pumpkinandpeach Pentax Medium Format 5 03-10-2017 04:55 AM
Shutter release: IR and cable, waiting for a Wi-Fi solution for Win/Mac cyberjunkie Pentax K-1 & K-1 II 11 11-04-2016 02:16 PM
Suggestions for remote shutter release cable / remote Sean Hamilton Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 8 06-09-2016 07:15 AM
DIY DSLR K-X “Cable” Cable Release trailrider Do-It-Yourself 4 07-11-2012 10:18 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:57 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top