Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
10-10-2019, 02:06 AM   #1
Veteran Member




Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: central Singapore
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 422
Q + M lens vs conventional telephoto zoom for M4/3

Good morning all

As my back is ageing, weight becomes a dominant factor in choosing gear, which is why I have partly migrated to M4/3 for travel use. But I still have a shedload of old Pentax DSLR bodies (any offers?) and lenses, including M lenses in good condition (dry box).

As an alternative to carrying a fairly substantial M4/3 telephoto zoom, would it make sense to get a Q body and put an M or K 28, M50 or M100 or M150 on the front? The body will weigh very little. The crop factor really cranks up the effective focal length.

The downside, I suppose, would be no EVF, and no stabilisation.
.
How does the Q image quality compare with the average phone these days? I bet it's better than my iPhone 6S.

10-10-2019, 02:37 AM - 1 Like   #2
Pentaxian




Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 1,498
For longer shots, anything with effective length above 50mm (which is what the "telephoto", lol, lens of the newest phones amounts to) will mop the floor with any phone, more so the 6S (which, while very good for its intended purpose, has only a 28ish equivalent lens)
The M150/3.5 is very small, under 300 g, but effectively 800mm already so maybe too much.
A Q with a fast fifty like the M50/1.4 or M50/1.7 would be your best bet I guess; effective length of 270mm is long but not "I need an external sight" long like the 100+ lenses.
10-10-2019, 03:45 AM   #3
Pentaxian




Join Date: Dec 2012
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,099
If you think about handholding 100 mm could be ideal, but I do not tested this particular lens. 150 mm might be too long for many, for me it is the longest I can use, really on the border. Sharp 50 mm lenses are also good for macro on the Q.
10-10-2019, 03:57 AM   #4
Forum Member




Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 95
As you already have the lenses then why not? You can use a cheap mechanical only adaptor or get the genuine Pentax one which has its own shutter built in. You do retain stabilisation, you will be prompted to enter the (actual) focal length on start-up. There is an optical viewfinder accessory but it only give a normal lens field of view, it might be helpful in initially aiming longer lenses but not more than that.

10-10-2019, 04:32 AM   #5
Veteran Member




Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: central Singapore
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 422
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by steephill Quote
As you already have the lenses then why not? You can use a cheap mechanical only adaptor or get the genuine Pentax one which has its own shutter built in. You do retain stabilisation, you will be prompted to enter the (actual) focal length on start-up. There is an optical viewfinder accessory but it only give a normal lens field of view, it might be helpful in initially aiming longer lenses but not more than that.
Somewhere I have a couple of those viewfinders that you put on the hot shoe. Can't remember what FOV the frames indicate. As you say they would only be useful for general aiming but it might be fun to try. I have 28, 50 and 100mm lenses that it would be worth having a go with.

OK, off to eBay I guess.

---------- Post added 10-10-2019 at 07:35 PM ----------

QuoteOriginally posted by Piotrek K Quote
If you think about handholding 100 mm could be ideal, but I do not tested this particular lens. 150 mm might be too long for many, for me it is the longest I can use, really on the border. Sharp 50 mm lenses are also good for macro on the Q.
I have an M50/4 macro - that could be interesting.
10-10-2019, 05:40 AM   #6
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Melbourne
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 595
QuoteOriginally posted by timo Quote
Somewhere I have a couple of those viewfinders that you put on the hot shoe. Can't remember what FOV the frames indicate. As you say they would only be useful for general aiming but it might be fun to try. I have 28, 50 and 100mm lenses that it would be worth having a go with.

OK, off to eBay I guess.

---------- Post added 10-10-2019 at 07:35 PM ----------



I have an M50/4 macro - that could be interesting.
I have the pentax Q K mount adapter and find it works very well,100mm lens gives equivalent to 550mm so as long as you treat it as a super tele with shutter speed and monopod etc, the photos work out well, as mentioned the stabilisation is in body so it still works
10-28-2019, 10:47 AM   #7
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Merano (BZ)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 47
QuoteOriginally posted by timo Quote
The downside, I suppose, would be no EVF, and no stabilisation.
Hi, the stabilisation is present, when you switch on the camera with a lens that is not one of the q lenses the camera ask you the mm of the lens so if the stabilisation is on the lens would be stabilsed in the right way (that can be a problem with a zoom but is ok with fixed lenses as yours).
10-29-2019, 02:19 PM   #8
Pentaxian




Join Date: Dec 2012
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,099
They IS iż suite efficient on the Q, but many tend to use lower value, like 130 instead of 150.

Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
body, camera, factor, lens, lenses, m4/3, macro, mirrorless, mm, pentax q, pentax q10, pentax q7, q-s1, q10, q7, telephoto, vs conventional telephoto
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Architecture A more conventional view Rickster Post Your Photos! 3 06-14-2018 08:09 PM
K-5 vs MZ-S vs LX vs PZ-1p vs ist*D vs K10D vs K20D vs K-7 vs....... Steelski Pentax K-5 2 06-28-2017 04:59 PM
Non-conventional wide-angle options bpv_UW Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 35 08-04-2014 06:24 AM
Telephoto comparison: Pentax vs m4/3? Elliot Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 4 03-03-2014 07:52 PM
B&W Filters - conventional vs digital FishrOfGrizz Photographic Technique 6 08-18-2010 08:08 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:23 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top