Originally posted by Heie I don't care if it was 10 generations old - I cannot possibly imagine a brand new body that surpasses the K5's. It captures the very best in weather sealing, ergonomics, button layout, and compactness. In my admittedly very biased opinion, the trophy for the engineering of an APS-C DSLR body has been retired.
I like the body as well but they can surely do things to improve it.
For one is a joystick type controll instead of a 4 way button, i at least find that more pleasant to use.
Dual-card slot is also on my list, and indeed the SD door can be made better.
More buttons are welcome, i never found the dual purpose 4way button to work for me, i like the Fn menu of the K10D and K20D much better.
As long as they keep the ergonimcs good, the camera small and the looks the same style i won't complain.
Originally posted by fast50 Not in the UK it's not. The RRP of the K-01 body is £629, while the K-5 body is currently retailing for £699.
But you're comparing market price with a suggested sale price and that's not the same.
Also the K5 is 1,5 years old so it has been reduced in price over the years.
Wanna bet that the K-01 will be £549,- within a month.
Originally posted by Philoslothical I have a hunch that you're correct on this. I think the only reason they haven't responded to the issue is that in their judgment, it isn't serious enough to warrant a recall of K-rs (and possibly K-5s, tho it seems to have got some relief via firmware). I have to wonder if the AF sensor on the K-5 had a better IR filter already in place compared to the K-r, but not quite good enough.
I've also the same feeling, it would cost them quite a bit off money since they also need to call back the 645D as well...
I'm now thinking of making a DIY solution by cutting a piece of IR filter and place it infront of the opening of the AF, i think that should do the job.