Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
04-16-2012, 07:15 AM   #16
Veteran Member
eddie1960's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Toronto
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 13,666
QuoteOriginally posted by Wheatfield Quote
I would never buy a Canon because they screwed their entire user base in the 80s. Once bitten, twice shy. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me and all that.
Which is why I went back to Pentax when My FD kit got stolen in a break-in Not a hope in hell I was going to reward them for screwing the users

04-16-2012, 12:40 PM   #17
Veteran Member
RioRico's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Limbo, California
Posts: 11,263
QuoteOriginally posted by Wheatfield Quote
I would never buy a Canon because they screwed their entire user base in the 80s.
They screwed their moderate-size FD user base (25 years ago?) in exchange for building their humongous EOS user base. Please don't think I'm defending their successful ploy. I'm no fanboi -- all my Canons have been film P&S midgets, and I've sold (at a nice profit) all the FDs I inadvertently acquired. I'm just not surprised that corporations screw their old customers when they see money looming. Oly screwed their OM users when they killed that line. Minolta too, when they switched from MD to AF. I'll posit that Kodak screwed 120 users when they introduced 620.

My mother-in-law is a classically-trained musician. She despises synthesizers because they put instrumentalists out of work. I didn't ask what she thought of all the wind players left unemployed after the pipe organ was invented. Point is, technology evolves, and supporting legacy technology forever is costly. Could Canon have made the EOS mount with the same or slightly shorter register than FD, for legacy support? I dunno; FD+EOS ain't my specialties. But screwing users (musical-photographic-etc) is richly rewarded. Don't be surprised by upcoming changes.
04-16-2012, 08:17 PM   #18
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Manila
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,185
Somewhere down the line, I also think the K-mount has to die (not now, though, not yet). But somehow, I hope Pentax keeps their optics principles intact, even if they do change the native mount for future cameras;

The SMC, excellent color reproduction, non-bulky lens build, the Limiteds, camera body ergonomics, etc. are the things I've identified as Pentax cool. If these are to be housed in a new mount, well, I'm sticking with buying Pentax. The older lenses I have now can still be used with my K-mount cameras, so I will not consider it a loss (though it would be great if they can make an adapter for it! Even if everything will become full manual)
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
ashton, nikon, pentax, photo industry, photography
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cannon / Nikon Lenses to a K-mount dSLR yalondg Ask B&H Photo! 2 08-17-2010 05:40 PM
Cannon EOS 550D vs. Pentax K-7 vs. Pentax K-x zone Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 16 08-08-2010 11:54 AM
cannon and nikon better light receiving? jolee1990 Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands 13 11-01-2009 08:58 PM
using cannon nikon sony lens jolee1990 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 16 10-28-2009 03:42 PM
Cannon EOS Vs. Pentax in Dynamic Range joreed3 Photographic Technique 7 02-11-2008 03:41 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:48 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top