Originally posted by Wheatfield I would never buy a Canon because they screwed their entire user base in the 80s.
They screwed their moderate-size FD user base (25 years ago?) in exchange for building their humongous EOS user base. Please don't think I'm defending their successful ploy. I'm no fanboi -- all my Canons have been film P&S midgets, and I've sold (at a nice profit) all the FDs I inadvertently acquired. I'm just not surprised that corporations screw their old customers when they see money looming. Oly screwed their OM users when they killed that line. Minolta too, when they switched from MD to AF. I'll posit that Kodak screwed 120 users when they introduced 620.
My mother-in-law is a classically-trained musician. She despises synthesizers because they put instrumentalists out of work. I didn't ask what she thought of all the wind players left unemployed after the pipe organ was invented. Point is, technology evolves, and supporting legacy technology forever is costly. Could Canon have made the EOS mount with the same or slightly shorter register than FD, for legacy support? I dunno; FD+EOS ain't my specialties. But screwing users (musical-photographic-etc) is richly rewarded. Don't be surprised by upcoming changes.