Originally posted by VisualDarkness I don't really understand the philosophy behind APS-H, the body isn't smaller anyway.
It's not meant to be about the body size, it's meant to a compromise between the I.Q. and D.O.F. that a bigger sensor gives you, with the speed and buffer that a smaller sensor gives you.
I rate it - I'd be happier with a FF but if Pentax were to release an APS-H I'd be near the front of the queue. A lot of lens options make good sense on an APS-H for me too - the 24-70mm is a bit short on FF I think (I know that MANY disagree) but with APS-H I'd probably have a: 16-35mm, 24-70mm, and 70-200mm... all FF lenses I know but still a good option (equiv. 21-46mm, 32-91mm, and 91-260mm). Maybe the 70-200 doesn't quite work... I'd be really interested to see if a 50-135mm could handle the 1.3x sensor, cos that'd be perfect IMO.