Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
02-06-2013, 01:11 AM   #31
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jan 2012
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 604
QuoteOriginally posted by Fogel70 Quote
You can't have an EVF that matches DR of your eyes without a sensor that do it too. And it will probably take some time for sensors to get 20+ EVs of DR. But a good start is if EVF can match DR of the sensor, which they can't today.
A comma does mean a lot...my fault.

Let me rephrase that:

... an EVF, or a sensor ...

Since sensors still have a long way to go in terms of DR, a good EVF for the mean time will at least tell me how the photo would look like before clicking.

The OM-D EVF isn't there yet but the info it provides is already very useful.

02-06-2013, 05:21 AM   #32
Veteran Member
falconeye's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Munich, Alps, Germany
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 6,871
QuoteOriginally posted by Fogel70 Quote
You can't have an EVF that matches DR of your eyes without a sensor that do it too. And it will probably take some time for sensors to get 20+ EVs of DR.
Just for the record ... this is false.

DR the way it is defined for photography (ratio of brightest/darkest features within an image) is rather limited for the human eye. It is a mere 6.5 EV if the eye doesn't move. It increases to a reasonable ~12 EV if it does move aka saccades (if you browse through the viewfinder image with your eye). However, this increase isn't instant and can take up to 4 seconds between saccades. This is why you better don't look into the headlights of an oncoming car.

So, the newest breed of sensors already beats the eye wrt dynamic range. And by quite a margin actually!

Now, if you allow for the eye's dark adaption which can take up to 30 minutes!, then voila, the dynamic range increases to 20 stops. But not within 1 image or within 1 second ...

A photo camera does this much more easily and again beats the eye wrt dynamic range by quite a margin: it simply adjusts aperture, shutter and iso ... I invite you to count the stops between brightest at f/32, 1/8000, iso100 and darkest at f/1.2, 30s, iso51200 [it is 42 stops...]

The real problem is that EVFs don't have 12 EV contrast (would need 14 Bit controllers and oled or better technology) and that they are too bright, ruining an eye's dark adaption. So, EVFs are useless at dark and render a flat image at daytime.

Last edited by falconeye; 02-06-2013 at 05:58 AM.
02-06-2013, 05:38 AM - 1 Like   #33
Veteran Member
audiobomber's Avatar

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sudbury, Ontario
Photos: Albums
Posts: 6,806
QuoteOriginally posted by falconeye Quote
So, EVFs are useless at dark and render a flat image at daytime.
And look cartoonish all the time.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
evf, pentax, photo industry, photography
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What Price EVF? johnmflores Pentax K-01 24 02-10-2012 10:25 AM
EVF for K-01 - The EVF Solution that some want in a product that already exists?! spade111 Pentax K-01 36 02-07-2012 03:13 PM
Evf/ovf? bencason Pentax K-01 17 02-04-2012 09:36 PM
The future of EVF? RioRico Photographic Technique 8 09-03-2011 10:03 AM
If you need an EVF on a Pentax body ... Russell-Evans Pentax DSLR Discussion 7 08-29-2010 05:20 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:13 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top