Originally posted by vodanh1982 A "pro" photographer is the one that earns the living through photography. It does not mean they are good or bad, rich or poor.
Pretty much. If it's become your main income, you're a professional.
And one would assume if enough people are willing to pay for your services that you can pay the bills, then you assume you aren't that bad a photographer.
Originally posted by tahoejeepmom I wanted to get in to photography but was told you can't make any money.
You can make money in photography.
You can't make money EASILY in photography.
It's a flooded market, pretty much everybody with the cash to buy an SLR nowadays will watermark their image with "blah blah's photography" and then they'll advertise to do photoshoots for $50
Then you've got hipsters with bloody camera phones calling themselves professional photographers and doing the same thing, only charging $5
It's a difficult thing to make money from because much of the public think "oh, it's just a photo, I could do that with my phone!"
The rest often say "why would I pay top dollar when I can hire that kid who's got a basic Canon and a kit lens who only charges $20 for a shoot"
People don't see the value. That's why the photographers that do make money often have to be extremely good at what they do, good enough for people to say "oh..... I can't do that.... that's why he/she's worth $100 and hour"