Originally posted by RonHendriks1966 You really need this photography course! A selfportrait is made by one self and not by someone else, since then it is a portrait of you made by that other person.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-portrait
So credit her and never talk again about having a not so good image.
From wiki:
Two methods of obtaining photographic self-portraits are widespread. One is photographing a reflection in the mirror, and the other photographing one's self with the camera in an outstretched hand. Eleazar Langman photographed his reflection on the surface of a nickel-plated teapot.
Another method involves setting the camera or capture device upon a tripod, or surface. One might then set the camera's timer, or use a remote controlled shutter release.
Finally, setting up the camera, entering the scene and having an assistant release the shutter (i.e., if the presence of a cable release is unwanted in the photo) can arguably be regarded as a photographic self-portrait, as well.
Our photography teacher said the exact opposite, that you can have someone else take a self portrait picture.
Let's not include that I took pictures of her and she can do whatever damn thing she wants with the pictures I took, which I sent to her (like the pictures she took).
And she did not mention anything about "full ownership" of the images, yet she says that it's sad that I would consider the pictures anything but hers, and that I have no right to edit or use her pictures even if I credit her
(I'm giving her full credit for taking the picture).
Quote: So it is still a selfportrait when you do all the work. Since that is not the case here, you blame her making a lousy picture, but with a selfportrait you would have set the camera to M-mode and made all setting right in the first place. So you can't blame her for not making a good image. She did that to her skills. I would say you thank her for the job and the learning curve she is in.
It was in fully manual mode and I actually did adjust every single setting (Aperture, Shutter Speed, ISO, white balance) to make a silhouette and underexpose the sunset to bring out the colors of the sunset while not blurring the waves (I do not mean to brag at all [because I really DO consider myself a beginner], I've taken and toggled with probably around 2-3 thousand sunset pictures in the last couple months of my starting photography, and have watched several videos and read several forums on the topic taking pictures of sunsets, knowing that I'd tend to be able to recover colors that are underexposed; I've also edited 400 pictures [individual] just this last week in Lightroom).
I also adjusted the focusing in advance (before posing repeatedly) since she didn't know how to like all the other settings.
Now, if she asked for or made it clear
in advance that she wanted "full ownership" of the pictures that she took and if I agreed with her, then obviously I would understand that she has total control of whatever picture she pressed the shutter at.
If I was threatening not to give her credit for taking the pictures and use her pictures, then we'd have a problem; however, as I've said, I'm giving her full credit for taking the shot - while crediting myself for the editing - but she says that I have no right to edit or even use her pictures even in such a case.
Originally posted by altopiet Well, after all this, I presume she is in your class, but definitely not your "mate" any more. If you think the shot is worth a lot of money, you'll have to fight for it, if not, hand her the unedited version and move on, life is too short to waist time over something like this...rather look for another mate, one who's not interested in photography
This is a case where absolutely NO money is involved, but she made an outrageously big deal out of it, calling me sick for even considering the pictures anything but completely and totally hers. I mean, we're ******* amateurs. This is not even taking into account that these are 3-4 pictures she would probably have never used.
And if there's one thing I won't do, it's give someone stuff ("full power" to the extent that I can't edit pictures I directed) because she's selfish. A nicer person might do that, but why should I?