Originally posted by j2photos It makes you wonder how many keepers they have and how many throw away images they have.
at 10-15 frames per second and expected 1 million images taken, I would expect maybe 1000-1500 images will be marketed. that's 1 keeper for every 1000 images if my math is right.
i'm not taking away from their talent and skill level, but I've been doing this long enough to know that 90% of a good action photo, be it wildlife or sports, is being in the right place at the right time.
I officiated High School and College Basketball and Baseball for 27 years. I can tell you with certainty, you reach a point where you have just about seen everything and the action becomes predictable by as much as 10-15 seconds. You get to know the athletes and know their tendancies and you just instinctively "know" what's going to happen. If you have access to their practice runs you know where on the course they will attempt certain high risk maneuvers. For that Shaun White Photo, i'd be willing to bet they'd watch him attempt it 4 or 5 times in practice and knew within 10 feet where he was going to land. All you need is one prefocused camera at that area and a decent crop, and boom, amazing photo.
Ancient archers used to do the same thing with aiming stakes set at various intervals in the battlefield.
And if all else fails, with many sports you just follow the ball/puck etc.
my point is, that with an entire advanced team planning shoots 4 years in advance and athlete's following essentially a known path, it makes it 100x easier to "be there". Throw in $50k of equipment and 15 fps, it elevates everyone's game a notch or two.
could 50% of the shooting populace pull these photos off? no. another 25% wouldn't even care to get up 2 hours before sunrise, but the other 25% of us could compete fairly well given that kind of logistical support.