[dadipentak]

I would never trust my computer to do that for me,

I agree--emphatically!

[takhyon]

Ok, thanks everyone, looks like it's pretty much unanimous that there's no need for it.

[SpecialK]

I have no need...my vision is still very good and I prefer to make the value call.


Steve

Yeah, that. You'd always (or should) be double-checking anyway, so what's the point? Chimping does not take that the long, and if it does routinely, you might review your shooting techniques.

(As much as I like Elements, it has an automatic "crop guesser" when I use the crop tool. Guess how many times I have ever used their suggestion?)

[lightbox]

I think the largely critical responses here are a reflection of the audience more so than the marketability of such an app. Put it up on Google Play and the Apple store, and it might sell well. Lots of selfies out there to sort through before posting online

[dadipentak]

I think the largely critical responses here are a reflection of the audience more so than the marketability of such an app. Put it up on Google Play and the Apple store, and it might sell well. Lots of selfies out there to sort through before posting online

As one of the designated curmudgeons on this forum, I have to observe that any attempt to impose quality standards on selfies is not only futile but dangerous.

[mattb123]

As one of the designated curmudgeons on this forum, I have to observe that any attempt to impose quality standards on selfies is not only futile but dangerous.

Not disagreeing but it could also be profitable!

[drypenn]

I don't need such a software.

Most of my shots are technically perfect, and evokes raw emotional passion. They are all saved in my head as visions. The bad ones, about a gigabyte of them, are all saved in my hard disks.