Originally posted by pathdoc Get in touch with the people who paid her for the review and tell them what she did.
Originally posted by MadMathMind This is a really good idea. They don't have any legal responsibility in the matter but they may well worry someone else is writing the content. From their perspective, content is content but if people start slapping "FALSE REVIEW" on them, they're in big trouble with the public, so they need to make everything look as clean as possible.
Sorry for resurrecting this thread but wanted to add something else
I'm in agreement with @pathdoc and @MadMathMind about approaching the blog host. By the description in the first post she also violated
17 U.S. Code § 1202 - Integrity of copyright management information. Adding false copyright information is also illegal. The blog host should be much more compliant about removing the offending images. It's one thing to use an image you don't have rights to. it's another to falsely apply your own copyright info to work that is not yours.
@mikerigel did you add copyright info to the exif info? Maybe she wasn't smart enough to remove it. that would be a nice smoking gun. If you did add your copyright info and she removed it, that's a second violation of the code I linked above.
As always consult a real lawyer. These are just things to consider. Good luck.