Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
05-22-2018, 11:43 PM   #16
Pentaxian
RonHendriks1966's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2009
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 9,460
QuoteOriginally posted by Mistral75 Quote
Olympus (the only company to provide such figure) spend 6.4% of their still camera revenues in associated R&D. Applying this ratio to all competitors, it would mean that the R&D budgets devoted to still cameras and lenses would be as follows:
  • Canon: 44bn
  • Sony: 31bn (excluding sensors)
  • Nikon: 23bn
  • Fujifilm: 6bn
  • Olympus: 3.5bn
  • Ricoh Imaging: 1.2bn.
Hard to know without any real information outside Olympus. My gut feeling says.....Canon spends less then that on r&d and shifts some more towards advertising while Sony (and it looks like Fujifilm also) spends even some more on r&d then that figure. Ricoh-Imaging is in a trapp where they can't fight out because there is no money to spend on advertising nor r&d.

05-23-2018, 12:22 AM   #17
Pentaxian




Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,209
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by Mistral75 Quote
Sony state that the size of the still camera market is 2,400bn, in which they hold

Sadly that is not relevant market share information (unless in a group of friends with 5 people driving a old Ford and one driving a new Porsche all those 6 people would agree that the market share of Porsche in their group is 80% ; I'd be surprised if that was the consensus).



Sony is good at hiding the fact that they are still such a small player with probably even less than 10% it seems. They seem to evade giving information on units sold.


This also is a good explanation, why they really have to fear the entry of any new players. Competition will quickly lead to lower prices and margins as well as further loss of market share.
05-23-2018, 03:47 AM   #18
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
clackers's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Melbourne
Photos: Albums
Posts: 12,752
Well, CIPA figures should give the total cash revenue of the Japanese camera makers.

05-23-2018, 06:51 AM   #19
Pentaxian
Mistral75's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Paris
Posts: 4,047
Yes and no: the unit prices used for CIPA calculations are ex works transfer prices, not the actual revenue made by the camera maker from the sale of each and every unit to third parties. The latter is reflected in the consolidated accounts.

Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
cameras, canon, data, fuji, fujifilm, guess, ilc, ilc market shares, lenses, market, market share, nikon, olympus, page, panasonic, pentax, photo industry, photography, price, ricoh, sales, share, sony, theta
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
dinosaur ILC mirroless -22,4% and DSLR -17,4% still dying out beholder3 Photographic Industry and Professionals 21 03-04-2018 08:41 AM
Extended 3 year Warranty on Pentax ILC > $1K f22 Pentax Price Watch 2 06-15-2017 11:55 AM
CMOS Market shares D1N0 General Photography 4 05-18-2017 05:09 PM
Kodak shares plunge as bankruptcy fears escalate jogiba Non-Pentax Cameras: Canon, Nikon, etc. 8 10-09-2011 08:24 AM
Nikon shares jump on report of mirrorless camera jogiba Non-Pentax Cameras: Canon, Nikon, etc. 4 09-10-2011 11:04 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:06 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top